Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page Moved, Histories Merged  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


OR

OR

--Cybercobra (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see no meaning "much more used than any other topic covered in Wikipedia" and conclude there is no primary topic --MegaSloth (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Recent edits to this page[edit]

Some recent edits to this page have been counterproductive. I would like to clarify a few points:

  1. Disambiguation pages document the contents of articles on Wikipedia. They do not reflect what individual editors believe what ought be there, or might be there in the future.
  2. Currently Glider redirects to Glider (sailplane). This makes that article the de facto primary topic, which may be a redirect: "When the primary topic is a redirect, the primary topic line normally links to the redirect" MOS:DAB#Linking to a primary topic
  3. Disambiguation entries should not attempt to be long comprehensive descriptions of a topic; that is what the articles are for, instead "The description associated with a link should be kept to a minimum, just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link." (MOS:DAB#Individual entries)

I believe that this version satisfies the criteria better than subsequent ones by other editors. Given that there is some ambiguity over whether Glider (sailplane) is a primary topic, I am prepared to leave that point until the end of the current move request at glider, when the situation is likely to change. however over-complex descriptions serve disambiguation poorly and should be avoided.

Please discuss further revisions here so that we can avoid edit warring.

Many thanks, --MegaSloth (talk) 19:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello adakiko[edit]

I would just like you to know that the last piece of information was learned by experience and not a lack of knowledge 194.247.67.208 (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply on why you actually removed this last piece of knowledge as the whole point of Wikipedia is for people to add their knowledge to the topic of their choice 194.247.67.208 (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Use of one's own knowledge is not wp:verifiable and should not be used on Wikipedia. See wp:original research. Adakiko (talk) 13:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]