This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mullenm05. Peer reviewers: Iginsberg.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, As part of a school assignment I reviewed this article and found that it is comprehensive and thorough. I added some information I felt was important to the conservation section, as well as making minor grammatical edits. Iginsberg (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I edited this page as part of an assignment for my Behavioral Ecology class at WashU. I added a few new sections and combined some of the older sections with new information. I also deleted some of the information on the page that was not cited. - mullenm05 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mullenm05 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
I think a key strength of this article is the many pictures inserted. However, this article is quite incomplete and could use an addition of many new sections, as it is considered a moth of high importance. It could benefit to know some information on flight habits, parasitism, mutualism, etc. I have made some changes relating to improper grammer, as the common name was capitalized in many places. I also changed the Migration section to Mating as Migration was not mentioned in that section. I also added to your lead section and added some information on diet in a section. Sahilmehta97 (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
This was a generally good article! It was a little bit short in length and I think it could be greatly improved by adding new sections with more information and fleshing out what is already here a little bit more thoroughly. I also noticed that there were many statements in the article that were uncited and I think it would help the credibility of the article to cite more of your information. This seems like an interesting butterfly to learn about! ClaudiaEE (talk) 05:18, 01 December 2017 (UTC)
This article seems to focus mainly on the occurrence of the butterfly in Finland and the UK. Given that it occurs over most of Europe, a more European-wide view needs to be taken. Also, I have just removed the following sentence, which is clearly rubbish. There are many species of butterflies called Fritillary. Portnadler (talk) 09:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This species of butterfly is uniquely named in that its common name is not "butterfly", but "fritillary".