GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Captain Galaxy (talk · contribs) 12:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: NatwonTSG2 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. The grammar and spelling are correct
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead section summarizes article adequately. Article is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not bombarded with words on the WTW list. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Reference section exists; no bare URLs spotted.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Other than CoroCro Comic, all of the articles are used in this article are considered reliable by WP:VG/S
2c. it contains no original research. No original research
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. According to Earwig
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. The article has information on the character's creation, role, appearances and reception
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Does not gone off-topic
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Article is neutral
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Article is stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Both images are tagged with their copyright status and have valid non-free use rationales.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. The character's render from Super Mario RPG remake showcases what Geno looks like and the concept art is serves for the character design section.

Lead

[edit]
 Done

Appearances

[edit]
 Done
 Done
Comment: Bowyer is the name of a character completely unrelated to Bowser that appears in geno's introduction
 Done
 Done

Reception

[edit]
Comment: This didn't make sense for to change as the higher stakes aren't something the player already possesses. On that front, I did change the word "gamer" to "player"
 Done
 Done Comment: I did change this up to keep the beginning half of the sentence to make it clearer to the reader that this was a separate wish
 Done Added the comma, though there already was a quotation mark at the end of the sentence so I wasn't sure what to do here.
 Done
 Done
 Done
 Done
 Done
Comment: I did a spell check here and "have" is the correct grammar here.

I will add more soon but this is what for now. NatwonTSGTALK 07:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: in the appearances section, what do you means by writing that Geno and the rest of the part which confused me so can you clarify it. NatwonTSGTALK 14:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has now been corrected. CaptainGalaxy 16:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments

[edit]

@Captain Galaxy there's not much for that needs to be clarifying and I wanted to promote this article to GA however, you told me that you're currently asking for a second opinion in the review so do you agreed I should promote the article to GA or put on hold.

NatwonTSGTALK 14:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]