Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 23:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article.Tintor2 (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC) @ProtoDrake:[reply]

Lead

• It aired twice so I would specify where in the lead.
  • Added " It had limited reruns on other international networks." Should address that without too much bloat.
• The lead reads well but I would expand on what was that mixed reception.
  • Expanded a little with the very few sources there are.

Overview

• I would rename the section to plot if it is meant to be entire story or premise if it's meant to be an intro.
  • Done.

Episodes

• Is there a general source that could be used for the release dates?
  • Believe me, myself and others tried looking very hard. Pretty much impossible outside those outlets. That's how niche this series has become. Those are the dates that were retrieved, and we managed to get solid confirmation of the debut and final episodes, but...that was it.

Broadcast

• This section seems a little lonely there. Could be moved to below production or a subsection too.
  • Merged broadcast and episodes into a single bulk section.

That's all. I see there is very little story reception but such commentary is also attributed in the lead section.

Revise this and I'll gladly pass the review.Tintor2 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Did my best with everything above. Honestly, it's a huge miracle I was able to find this much about the series, it's pretty much near-lost media by this point. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passing review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)