GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

Station design

History

Previous stations

South Coast Rail

References

General comments

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 22:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: Thanks for the review! I've replied to your comments above. I'll take a look at reviewing one of your GA noms, though I may demur due to my lack of BLP experience. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for making those changes and for explaining what you did not change. Happy to pass this article! — GhostRiver 19:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]