GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer:  狐 FOX  01:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there... I've had to  Fail this article this time around. I don't think you've quite done what was requested in the last GAN. However, I'll give you a list of stuff to fix:

Well written

[edit]

Facts and junk

[edit]

Broadness

[edit]

Neutral, Stability and Images

[edit]

Give me a yell when you're done these.

Wow, you really had to fail that?? I could have EASILY fixed that shit. Your failing was unnecessary. CrowzRSA 19:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's more other than this. You've not fixed a lot of the stuff from the first GAN.  狐 FOX  20:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just add...

[edit]

Sorry to butt in, but I think it's important to mention that it is by no means clear what the alt cover is adding to the article. If it is genuinely signficant, why is it not even mentioned in the article? Non-free images should be used in articles only when their presence significantly adds to reader understanding. Even if it was warranted, the file is too large. Album covers will rarely need to be more than 300x300px. J Milburn (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]