Notable?[edit]

Right now[1] we have a WP:PROD saying "No presented media coverage to meet WP:N". (I didn't know that was a reason to delete. If so, wouldn't all unsourced articles be put up for WP:PROD?) I do not know if the topic is notable, but I found some sources that suggest it may be, so I am removing the WP:PROD.

Because I found these sources I figure this topic might be notable, so I'm removing the prod. Jesanj (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work...any chance you could provide the weblinks to these articles? These are exactly the type of thing needed for WP:N. — Scientizzle 19:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I may wash my hands of this article, FYI. Some of them I bet are off-line. I found them through a Proquest database. NYT should pop up on google though. Jesanj (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Found a couple links. — Scientizzle 21:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
More Importantly, I'm concerned that we are not discussing the controversial claims made in the film.

24.240.74.46 (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio issues[edit]

Unfortunately, this article had masses of copyvio, that came out when I started checking the sources to prepare to improve it, post-AfD. I shan't object to its recreation (with appropriate balancing of the fringe claims), of course, but... this is unusual. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bulk of the article text was derived from a series of cut & paste edits from IMDB, made by an anonymous IP editor in February 2015. At the time the article was deleted a day ago, the majority of the article's text – a summary of the film's content – was still word-for-word identical. (To add insult to injury, that same section of the article had borne an unresolved, ignored cleanup tag since March 2015.) TenOfAllTrades(talk) 01:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

More sources[edit]

The following sources can be used to expand the article.,[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] [7], [8]. North America1000 04:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Food Matters - a lot more than drugs". Montreal Gazette.
  2. ^ "Review of the independently funded film 'Food Matters'". Mother Nature Network.
  3. ^ "Doco dishes up success". Sunshine Coast Daily.
  4. ^ "Proof's in the eating". The Sunday Star-Times.
  5. ^ "Food Matters founder to speak in Caloundra". Sunshine Coast Daily.
  6. ^ "New Film Offers Wisdom on Struggling Health Care System: "Food Matters"". Heart Disease Weekly. (subscription required)
  7. ^ "Film informs about therapeutic nutrition". Townsend Letter. (subscription required) (Short article)
  8. ^ "Bite-Size Indies in Competition on Your Couch". The New York Times. (1 paragraph)