This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has anyone got any up to date stats for FCC on the Thameslink route? There's been a considerable dip in service over the last few weeks with lots of delays and cancellations. It's a pretty poor service on the Thameslonk route at the best of times. It's got a lot worse recently.
I don't have figures unfortunately, but the disruptions have been severe, and subject to much discussion, so I've added a short section on them, and the industrial dispute which has caused them. Smells like content (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Just to say i have created an article on the Great Northern Route as i keep hearing the line refered to it as this between
Kings Cross and Moorgate
then either
or Hertford North
Destinations:
Stevenage then:
or Peterborough
I need some advice as to whether to keep thi article and if so can people make vast improvements to it as though it were a proper article describing the route.
Simply south 22:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
IMO the usage figures at each station between PB and Cuffley to Peterborough and Cambridge are going to DECREASE dramatically with these restrictions. They also apply between Radlett and Bedford. Simply south 18:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
The restriction in off-peak tickets is surely evil genius by FCC. Firstly it is a stealth price increase for those that must catch these train services, and secondly it will discourage some people from catching these trains making it look like FCC is improving the over crowding situation. Rail commuters lose out on both fronts. --212.159.69.172 19:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
OK I have a slight problem here.
I have a very reliable source who told me, in writing, the following (exactly as writen);
"FCC has a large fleet of electric multiple units, comprising 41 Class 313s, 12 Class 317s, 86 Class 319s and 40 Class 365s. These will be supplemented by a further eight Class 319s from Southern in December. A further five '321s' will arrive next May while in 2010 London Overground's Class 313s will move to FCC, allowing busy inner-suburban services to be strengthened."
That whole bit above totally confused me and I really want to edit this article correctly -- could someone ideally experienced please help me with this.
Thanks.
TXC (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
The article is accurate. FCC currently have 78 out of a possible 86 class 319 units. The remaining 8 units are being used by Southern, and will be transferred by December 2008.
Thelem (talk) 23:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
(copyed from my talk page) As witnessed above your understanding of what to do when you believe you haven't found a reliable source is slightly out of line with Wiki policy. If you do find a section in an article that you come to question, its best to place a note or a cite tag in it, rather than removing the info completely. As such I will be reverting the edits you have made on the First Capital Connect page. Sgreen93 (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
I notice a notice has been placed at the top of the page calling the Criticism section into question.. Now, since nothing has actually been posted on the talk page I thought I'd start with the obvious question: Does anyone have any proposals as to what we should do with it? Sgreen93 (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Could someone please identify the (very short) train in this picture? Thanks! cmɢʟee୯ ͡° ̮د ͡° ੭ 00:06, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
This article is lacking in references within a lot of sections - am going to try and clean it up over the next few days. In addition, there are a fair few spelling/grammar corrections to be made. If anyone has a free moment and can help clean up the page, that would be brilliant - thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 12:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
((refimprove))
is inappropriate. If you believe that there are a lot of sections which lack refs, please put a ((refimprove|section))
into those particular sections, or a ((citation needed))
onto specific sentences. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Is it just me, or is the criticism section a bit small, considering that there are a lot of unsatisfied customers? Could it be expanded, as I am sure there are a lot of notable points of reference about?31.54.205.221 (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)