Fallout 4: Nuka-World has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 27, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Fallout 4: Nuka-World received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

A fact from Fallout 4: Nuka-World appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 September 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that a reference to "DLCNukaWorld.esm" in the source code of Fallout 4 led to rumors of Fallout 4: Nuka-World months before its announcement? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fallout 4: Nuka-World.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Vector Unit (2 participants) Anton Rayne (9 participants) Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) (4 participants) Jeffrey Ventrella (4 participants) Darkworks (2 participants) Ayeah Games (2 participants) Keemokazi (1 participant) Batboat (14 participants; relisted) Merge discussions HoYoverse (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Monster Hunter World: Iceborne (discussion) Forge (level editor) (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Teardown (nom) Mario Party DS (nom) Good article nominations Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (nom) Pikachu (nom) Donkey Kong (start) Laura Matsuda (start) Puff-puff (Dragon Quest) (start) Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) (start) Yume Nikki: Dream Diary (nom) Hyper Duel (start) Fortnite Festival (nom) Jacksepticeye (nom) Bonfire (Dark Souls) (nom) Gengar (start) Laika: Aged Through Blood (start) Leifang (start) Megamania (start) Barry Burton (start) Tina Armstrong (start) Little Samson (start) Geno (Super Mario RPG) (start) Cat Bird (nom) Rockstar North (start) DYK nominations Barry Burton Jacob Geller Goodboy Galaxy Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom) Pokémon Channel (nom) Amiga Format (rev) Kim Kitsuragi (rev) Undertale (rev) Articles that need... assessment (1) (1) reassessment (0) cleanup (8) infoboxes (7) cover art (241) screenshots (8,802) photos (63) translation from japan (185) creation merging Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 12 October 2016..Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fallout 4: Nuka-World/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 22:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I always mistake Fallout for BioShock... Cognissonance (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

• "found in Fallout 4's code" — Clarify: "found in Fallout 4's source code". Also, link to Source code.
• "Development of this expansion was confirmed" — Minimize repetition: "Development was confirmed".
• "The expansion received a mostly positive reception" — Minimize repetition and correct: "Fallout 4: Nuka-World received both a positive and mixed response".
• "with reviewers praising the new locations, but they compared" — Improve flow: "with reviewers praising the new locations, but comparing".

Infobox

• Add | modes = Single-player.

  Done on Wikidata.

Gameplay

• "Nuka-World is an expansion pack for the post-apocalyptic action role-playing single-player video game Fallout 4" — Coincide genres with lead.
• "It is the territory of raiders," — Clarify: "Nuka-World is the territory of raiders;".
• "and upon arrival, they are dropped" — Improve flow: "and upon arrival are dropped".
• "new enemies and more powerful versions of existing enemies" — Minimize repetition: "new enemies and more powerful versions of existing ones".
• "The Pip-Boy, a small computer strapped to the character's wrist which contains maps, statistics, data, and items, plays a role" — Simplify: "The Pip-Boy – a small computer strapped to the character's wrist which contains maps, statistics, data, and items – plays a role".
• "The ability to swap between first-person and third-person perspectives is available in both the expansion and the original version" — Move up so that it follows the first sentence.

Development and release

• "(in order of release)" — Not necessary.

Reception

• Instead of putting the publications in parentheses, write it in prose.

  I'd like this article to be consistent with the other expansion pack article (Far Harbor), so I'm going to leave them in parentheses.

• The section could also do well with being written in the past tense.
• Remove the Spanish and Italian IGN scores. This is an English article about an American video game.

  References don't need to be in English. They add content to the article and I see no reason to remove these.

@Anarchyte: I don't see the use for two XONE scores though. As a reader, it could easily be confusing.

I'll remove one of them from the template. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "The releases of Nuka-World" — Simply say "Nuka-World". The different platform scores are elaborated on in the next sentence.
• Stuff like "Bob Fekete (iDigitalTimes) said", "Davide Ambrosiani (IGN) said" and "Juan Garcia (IGN) said" needs to be reworded with more variety.

  See above

You misunderstand. As was done in Far Harbor, the word "said" needs to be reworded with more synonyms, per User:Mike Christie/Copyediting reception sections. Cognissonance (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. I'll try to add some more variety. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links

• Add [[Category:Gangs in fiction]].

Overall

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Prose is a problem. Otherwise it's a solid article.

   Pass/Fail:

   @Anarchyte: Also, while you're at it, change the instances of British English spelling to American English for consistency. Cognissonance (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cognissonance: Thanks for the quick review. I've left a few comments above and striked everything I've done. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cognissonance: I've addressed your replies above. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Pass/Fail:

   @Anarchyte: Good to go. Cognissonance (talk) 09:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]