This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft makes first flight

USAF has news release that the Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft version of the 328JET has had its first flight (http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123152339). Complete with government pictures that may be of use 70.117.21.62 (talk) 04:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. All the photos on that page state "Courtesy", which generally means that they are not US Federal Government photos, and thus not public domain. We need to be absolutley certain these are PD photos before trying to use them as such. Oddly, this site had a photo that I distinctly remember as stating "Lockheed Martin photo" about an hour ago, but it now says "USAF photo". This is definitely something which needs further investigation, because I would certainly love to use a PD photo in the Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft article. - BillCJ (talk) 12:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Data

On wiki page, under the Performance heading, the speed data for 328JET has been supplied as: Maximum speed: 685 km/h; 426 mph (370 kn) Cruising speed: 750 km/h (466 mph; 405 kn) which means the cruising speed is higher than the maximum speed!

On the 7th link of references, the correct speed is given as: Max cruising speed 750km/h (405kt)

I think a correction on wiki page is necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.213.157.88 (talk) 05:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus. Fair point each side, and it has been relisted. There is no consensus for moving now. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 03:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fairchild Dornier 328JET → Fairchild Dornier 328Jet – Per MOS:TM. "JET" is a stylization, not an acronym. feminist (talk) 10:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the nom. Primergrey (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Common style and clarity. "328JET" makes it clear that this is the name, as "328Jet" could be read as "328 jet".- BilCat (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With BilCat on this one. - ZLEA _Talk ^Contribs 18:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.