This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Moka pots are not "espresso makers"... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.175.76.2 (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Macktheknifeau: this is a warning. The article has entire sections, and at least half a dozen individual paragraphs, that require sourcing. The current tag is specifically made to point out such article-wide issues. Repeated removal of a long-standing, unresolved maintenance tag without good reason and without resolving the indicated issue is disruptive, damaging to the encyclopedia, and will get you reported. If you really have some deep-seated problem with the tag, make your case here, otherwise a report for edit-warring is likely to even precede that one. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Your tag is irrelevant and makes no sense, and the elements you're claiming "aren't sourced" are clearly sourced within the article sources. If you're too lazy to bother doing your own research why are you aggressively defending these dumb tags? Macktheknifeau (talk) 07:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...there is one single sourced statement in the entire section Espresso_machine#Pump-driven (861 words). The entirety of Espresso_machine#Stove_top is unsourced, as is the second paragraph of Espresso_machine#Machine_parts. Are you honestly not seeing those, or have not yet understood that long unsourced passages area a problem in this encyclopedia? Either case is something of a disqualifier for any work with maintenance tags. Please desist. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]