Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Quick fail criteria assessment
- The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
- The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
- There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
- The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
- The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
No problems found when checking against quick fail criteria, on to main review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The article is reasonably well written
- b (MoS):
- I don't think the Lead adequately summarises such a complex article.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
One dead link found, ref #21 [1]; other links fixed using WP:CHECKLINKS. ...followed by a Soviet annexation of roughly the same eastern Finnish territories as the prior interim peace treaty as part of the Karelo-Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic. has a citation needed tag. I note that some of the citation styles are inconsistent, eg. ref 68 & 73;
- updated. n
- Citation need tag still outstanding. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Sources appear reliable - I assume good faith for those that I cannot access.
- c (OR):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- It would be good to have a little more detail in the captions of leaders rather than just the name.
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: