![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The first inital release of ePSXe was Saturday, October 14th 2000 [1] and the first screen shots of ePSXe were initially shown on Emulatronia in August of 2000 [2]
25/10/2006 - Removed "trivia" section. There are nutjobs trolling on project forums everywhere. The "fake discontinuation" incident of ePSXe couldn't have been very important, none of us have heard of it. Just a stupid post by a lame one-post wonder troll. Trivia should be important stuff... e.g. Easter Eggs included in the emulator, the devs all code while under the influence, or something significant like that. Not a stupid forum post, a dime a dozen occurances. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.95.45.111 (talk • contribs)
Trolls ? Nutjobs ? Mahadi, this concerns ePSXe's very develeopment status actually. There might be some rationale in regulating that section, shortening it or reword in (in a short paragraph), but that still doesnt change the fact ePSXe is NOT updated any longer, for wathever reason it is (be it legal or technical, but this uncertainty was mentioned anyway). That section could've been a little longer than it'd have deserved, but that fact still requires to be mentioned in the article, to make it clear it is DISCONTINUED, as in "not updated any longer". --Omega Said 14:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
_Demo_ himself addressed this post by hushypushy on Jan 26 2007 and stated it to be false[3]. For now I will just be removing the false statements, since five words by a developer (who hasn't posted in over three years) isn't very much to derive anything from. PaulToompas 00:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
This section should be removed, calb has confirmed it[4]. -hushypushy
I wanted to go ahead and clean up some of the article's wording, but I'm not an expect on this subject. I went ahead and added this tag to hopefully draw some attention toward the issue. 74.242.99.30 11:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
is this for play station 1 only or play station 2 as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.13.92 (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:EPSXe.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
the opening paragraph says "It has been described as the best freeware Playstation emulator available." Sourced or not, this line is completely subjective, has no place in a Wikipedia article, and I'm removing it. I'm sure I could find a source saying its the worst freeware Playstation emulator available, but that doesn't mean it belongs in an encyclopedia. Canine virtuoso (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Took out a segment in the Compatibility section listing all the changes from version 1.6 to 1.7. That belongs in the software documentation and the homepage's changelog, not Wikipedia. Canine virtuoso (talk) 02:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Discussion more about user conduct than directly about improving the article
|
---|
So the admins said to continue this discussion at the article's talk page from [5]. I ONLY removed those three references because I reverted your edit that didn't explain why my edit was vandalism and I didn't know they were added, so then I stopped removing them. But oh, you still kept reverting my edits! I DID NOT revert other edits by you other than the table to show the full names of the months and the date formats; seriously, why not show the full names of the months?! The dates in the article were originally in the format MM/DD/YYYY, so yes you DID change the format! And I DID NOT order you to put in an "Android releases" table, I was saying that's what would be better. The other guys are right, you're just acting like you own this bloody article! I can edit it as well, and you cannot justify reverting my good faith edits without providing a valid explanation, which you STILL haven't done! And for the love of Christ, I see you once again accused me of being a vandal: "My additions were just blindly reverted by a person who is known for vandalizing." WHEN WILL YOU GET IT THAT I AM NOT A GODDAMN VANDAL?!?!?!?!?!?! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY IT?!?!?! I AM NOT A VANDAL! I AM NOT A VANDAL! I AM NOT A VANDAL! IS THAT ENOUGH FOR YOU?! Like I said before, the IP address User talk:198.7.62.204 was blocked because someone else made those edits, not me; it's a shared IP. Look at the administrators' noticeboard, they don't think I'm vandalizing. You can mention your precious little admins who stupidly blocked me, but the fact is some admins agree with me too! Now seriously, stop this complete and utter BS because my edits are NOT damaging the article in any way, shape or form! I am now going to reinstate my edits; see if you can find a single removed reference or ANY form of vandalism. You won't find any, so if you revert it again then I know you're just purposely annoying me! --Mister Potato 47 (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
|