This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Shouldn't this be at Dragon_Warrior_Monsters with a redirect from quest and not the other way round? This is the English version of wikipedia and they were released in England and America under the former name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.68.15.194 (talk • contribs) .
Square Enix has retired the Dragon Warrior trademark name so it is best to follow their transistion to the Dragon Quest trademark. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by J. Nguyen (talk • contribs) .
User:Raptogoon didn't consult any of us before renaming/moving the article. You don't see the Dragon Quest article with an messy name called, "Dragon Quest/ Dragon Warrior". Wikipedia should just to stick one name and briefly mention that it is called, Dragon Warrior Monsters in North America. Square Enix now uses the Dragon Quest trademark exclusively these days so we should follow them. --Who What Where Nguyen Why22:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Dragon Quest Monsters Joker is already its own stub, so why not break up the other games into their own articles using the names they were released as in the UK and North America. The gameplay section and common elements can remain with this article as a summary of this spin-off series.Zenithian01:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"The first Dragon Quest game to be released for the Gameboy Advanced and to be released under the Square Enix name."
The part about Square Enix is false. You can see "(C)2003 ARMOR PROJECT/BIRD STUDIO/SQUARE ENIX All Rights Reserved." on the official Square Enix site, but when the game was released Square Enix did not exist, and of course in the game and in the box, manual, etc. it says Enix everywhere.
It's not really a case of "replacing the series article with the first game", it's more like replacing a redirect to the series article with the first game. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking at this page, and see the Japaneses box art for Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker is here, but on the actual Joker Page, the English/North American Box Art is present. My opinion is that this Japanese box art should be deleted and not used at all on this page. Thoughts? Sgetz (talk) 16:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should there be any Box Art there? My opinion is that it is not needed as it does not add anything to this page, and instead leave it on the Joker Article. Thoughts? Sgetz (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the Japanese Box Art, and as discussed, have not added anything back, as it does not add anything to this page. Sgetz (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On the Woodus website, there is news of a DQM:J2. I won't bother putting it up here, but someone else can if they want =)http://www.woodus.com/den/home.php
There are some DQM mobile games that were released only in Japan, such as DQM Wanted! [1]. I don't have much information about them though. --MK (talk) 11:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Dragon Quest Monsters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on Dragon Quest Monsters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
While I found an article from a different source that could be used to support the sentence, an important Wikipedia policy is due weight, and I don't think that a sentence supported by a single (non-unreliable) source about a minor controversy is as important as the other few details about The Dark Prince such as its development studio, so I am not re-adding the sentence with the different source cited. QuietCicada (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]