Untitled[edit]

I agree prosecuting one notable case does not make you notable. However this is a very senior post, although I recognise the article could be clarified on this point. Please give people time to improve newly created articles. PatGallacher (talk) 23:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dorothy Bain/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Goodreg3 (talk · contribs) 23:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig finds some overlap here. I think this is just about OK; most of it is quotes, and the main sentence other than quotes is quite hard to rephrase. Checking further down the Earwig list finds only quotes.

Sources:

Spotchecks (footnote numbers refer to this version.

There are seven images of Bain; do we really need all seven? I haven't reviewed the images for copyright yet; let me know if you think any can be cut before I do so. Multiple images is fine but a couple of these seem unnecessary. I'll wait till the sources comments above are addressed before going ahead with a review of the body of the article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Goodreg3, are you planning to work on this? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]