Food and drink: Beverages Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

The WikiProject classification for Donkey punch (cocktail) is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  12:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use ((subst:requested move)). Do not use ((requested move/dated)) directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

• Donkey punch (cocktail) → Donkey Punch (cocktail)
• Donkey Punch (disambiguation) → Donkey Punch

– According to the recipe appended as the article's inline cite, the drink has a proper name rendered with an uppercase "P". Since all disambiguation page entries, other than the putative WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and the Donkey puncher redirect to Steam donkey, would be using an uppercase "P", Donkey Punch can stand alone as the dab page main title header, rather than serve as a redirect to Donkey punch. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support 2nd, no comment on 1st. No primary topic for the capitalized version per WP:DIFFCAPS, 4,646 views for the this one but 1,744 for the 2008 film and 374 for the 2005 one[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the first move per WP:NCCAPS/WP:MOSCAPS. The International Bartenders Association has different capitalisation rules from Wikipedia. This issue has come up in relatively recent move requests at Talk:Long Island iced tea and Talk:Black and tan. (In case donkey punch is sui generis, I initiated a separate discussion at WT:MOSCAPS to get input on the issue in general.) I am agnostic on the second move. —  AjaxSmack  19:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose the first move per AjaxSmack. Linguistically speaking, this is not a proper name. It is also not a trademark name. It's more like Club sandwich, Five-card stud, Field hockey or Viennese waltz. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above. 162 etc. (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Mainly per AjaxSmack and BarrelProof. Donkey punch is a punch. punch is a category of drinks. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  "Fruit punch", with a lowercase "p", is a generic descriptive name — a punch made from fruit. "Donkey Punch (cocktail)", with an uppercase "P", is not a generic descriptive name — it is the name of a specific "(cocktail)". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It is a punch. It is made specific to refer to a particular punch because the root noun is being modified by an attributive noun "donkey". Specificity is not ipso facto a rationale for capitalisation. Cinderella157 (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Ditto. Here goes a regurgitated version of something I noted here:

  User:Roman Spinner mentioned "donkey punch" being "the name of a specific [cocktail]", but a better term would be that it is "the name of a type of cocktail". Use pens and grammar here to form an analogy: "Pens are for writing." – generic; "I have a pen on my desk." – specific but indefinite; "The pen on my desk doesn't write." – specific and definite. Whether generic or specific or definite or indefinite, pen remains an uncapitalised common noun. I can replace "pen" with a type of pen (e.g. ballpoint pen, quill, fudepen), and the three sentences would remain viable. The same with types of drinks (e.g. Beer is good for health; Yesterday I drank a beer; The beer that I drank yesterday was India pale ale → Donkey punch is not so good for health; Last night I had a donkey punch; The donkey punch I had last night was horrible). On the other hand, you could not make sentences like these with proper names like Wikipedia or Tsar Nicholas II. So in short, being a type of something or being specific does not make it proper.

  The intro of Wikipedia's proper name article says uniqueness is a factor as is the idea of being a single entity. There is not one unique donkey punch or Long island iced tea or green tea or India pale ale. All have been drunk millions of times. (But I'll admit these issues are not always clear cut especially when related to capitalisation—there have been innumerable Mays and autumns.) —  AjaxSmack  02:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the first move per AjaxSmack and BarrelProof. Support the second move as the sexual practice (to which Donkey Punch currently redirects) is not a proper name. Graham (talk) 04:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose 1st move per MOS:ACTCAPS, which addresses all manner of "modern folklore" pop-culture topics that are not proper names. Support 2nd move per Graham11 and WP:DIFFCAPS.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]