Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs ) 14:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
I'll give this one a look, hopefully later today. Canadian Paul 14:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (MoS for lead , layout , word choice , fiction , and lists ) :
It is factually accurate and verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to reliable sources ) : c (OR ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
It follows the neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Well, once again I performed some minor copyedits, but otherwise this article seems to satisfy the GA criteria, so I will go ahead and pass it. Congratulations and thank you again for all your work! Canadian Paul 21:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]