This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There should be a "core city" disambiguation page. In the United States, a core city is an older one, typically arising before the development of modern transportation, which now forms the center of a greater metropolitan area.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.66.105 (talk) 11:25, 23 February 2007
I've deleted the following statement because it is uncited, inconsistent with the list of cities in the article (which quotes two cities in both of two regions), and rather incomprehensible (especially the last sentence):
I've tried to follow up the links, but the core cities own web site is totally vague about what constitutes the region each city is 'head of'. I suspect it is a different set of regions from the UK government regions that the article uses, but cannot really tell.
Bottom line. A group of big cities have got together in an association to push their case against other possible groupings of cities, and need some justification for doing so. Trying to put strict geographic and numeric justifications for who is in the group and who isn't is probably just playing past the post rationalisation, and WP should remain aloof. Report the fact there is a grouping, who is in it, and leave it at that. -- Chris j wood (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Could someone upload the coats of arms of the eight Core Cities to Commons and place the images in the right categories? Thanks. Pabletex (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
The article says The Core Cities Group is more than 10 years old. 10 years old from what date? Date of writing the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.217.111.202 (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This page's text is lifted word-for-word from the Core Cities Group website and reads like a propaganda leflet! 94.30.61.223 (talk) 18:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Core Cities Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The cities over 440.000 poulation in the metropolitan area have a bigger statistical growth, easy to check following th emiddle growth in Russia, Brazil or (those, equivalent, with core population over 150.000 in USA). Problably due to synergies, scale advantage, motivations,...
The Core cities plus Edimburg, Portsmouth and London (and then the University cities of Oxford and Cambridge) are the industrial and economic souls of UK.
The fast train link, normal high speed of hyperloop will be an economic growth factor at increasing the synergies between those main centers, working then as neighborhoods, one for each other.
For example the development of a high speed train (convectional /Hyperloop-Maglev) from London to Oxford then a Y to Bristol and Manchester, Y to Liverpool and Leeds-North.
And an UK Development and Industrialization Institute/Fund/Bank to finance 100% at 5 years at 0% interest the transport electrification, solar-thermal and heat pumps and window updates, and industry (imports substitution, product launch/export, R+D, improvement/automation with repay under 5 year...).
--188.171.57.29 (talk) 13:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)