Compliance requirements was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I believe the article meets the Good Article criteria. I do, however, have some suggestions that I think would improve the article:
Add an illustration such as scanning the cover from a paper copy of one of the Compliance Requirements (CR) or uploading a screen shot as an image file from the front page of a CR URL.
Add a "Background" section to the article that explains in greater detail why the CR's were written and published and the history behind them, such as who ordered it, when they were written and by who.
Add a section on how they can be accessed by the general public, whether by web only, or if paper copies are available and how, or if also available by other media (CD, DVD, etc). Also, how does access to the instructions comply with federal statutes such as the disabilities acts (for access to government services), etc.
What government agency maintains the CRs, when are they updated, and how is the public informed of any updates or changes to the CRs?
The article contains really good, detailed, information and I congratulate you on passing the GA review. Cla6807:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This 2007 addition has 5 citation needed templates. I am also concerned on the broadness of the article; currently it is like a summary of the directives, no history of how it was created or necessary background information, updates to the directives throughout the years, etc. Spinixster(trout me!)10:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.