This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Potential sources

Just dumping a number of sources here, and hoping some of them are reliable when we analyse them afterwards. --Coin945 (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and group these and if usable, non-usable, or trivial, I'll try to explain why.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[3] This one is a review on a site where anyone can review.
[4] Non-notable blog
[5] Another non-notable blog (NNB from here out)
[6] NNB
[7] This is just a YouTube link to one of the songs. Fun, but not really usable as a source.
[8] NNB
[9] NNB
[10] Not really a RS, and looks to be a mirror of a past version of this page.
[11] Not really usable to show notability and besides, we really need a reliable source or at least a mention of someone on the crew verifying this, otherwise it would just be original research. As such, I've removed it.
[12] NNB
[13]

[14] I've heard of Retroist, but I'm not sure if he's a staff member or an average reviewer. It's maybe usable, but I had enough questions about it to where I held off adding it.
[15] This one is somewhat dubious, but I've heard of this site and I think this is the one that's done by a staff member.
[16] It looks like this was published through a journal put out by the Popular Culture Association of the South. I'n not sure as to how high in regards the journal is, or how much of a trusted authority this guy is. It'd take some research.

[17] This one is actually good, but I'm putting it here because I'm not sure if this is a big enough FF to where this would count as being "screened five years after initial release". I've added it to the page, though.
[[18] This is ultimately trivial since it mentions the film in relation to the guy, but it's not in-depth enough to where it'd give notability.
[19] The film festival programs or mentions are good, but might be considered trivial by some so I'm putting it here.
[20] This is just restating that it aired at the RI FF, which we've already sourced.
[21] This would be trivial at best, but the thing with this is that it looks to have been taken from a blurb from another site, which makes its claims somewhat questionable. It's somewhat common for sites to pull from other pages, some of which were edited by random people.
[22] This one actually announces it as a winner, so I'll replace the other link with this one. It's not really a big FF, so I don't think that the award here really gives notability. Most awards don't, unless they're by a big, big film festival.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]