GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 20:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not quite a drive-by nomination but the reviewer has only made one small change to the article before nominating, and has not addressed its more significant issues in need of cleanup.

Overall, I think there may be a lot of excessive detail in the article. It needs to take a higher-level view of the subject.

As such, I think this meets WP:GAFAIL criteria #1 (it is a long way from being properly sourced) and #3 (it has large numbers of citation needed tags that are still valid). It was not ready for a GA nomination and should not be re-nominated until these issues are addressed.

David Eppstein (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added References to Lungs section. Iflaq (talk) 12:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Added References to Etymology section. Iflaq (talk) 18:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.