GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of issues that need to be addressed. As many sports related GAs are unmaintained and not improved, I will be providing only a cursory review to begin with. This review will be placed on the talk page and I will notify the wikiprojects involved (not necessarily at the same time). The article will then have seven days from the day of notification for someone to come forward and start making the suggested changes and taking responsibility for the article here. If someone comes forward, I will supply a more detailed review, if someone does not then the article will be delisted. If someone is working on the article then, within reason, there will be no time limit in which the changes have to be made.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- The prose is not good, maybe a 4/10 average. There are a lot of loose sentences unconnected to the text around them.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR):
- a (references):
- Very few references for an article of this length. Some appear to be unreliable, others are improperly formatted.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- No Personal life section and many other sections are impossible to understand.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Good work, article now passes GA.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)