The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that before Foster City was built on Brewer Island, unsuccessful proposals included a hog farm, two military air bases, two civilian airports, and an entertainment complex larger than Disneyland?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that before Foster City was built on Brewer Island, unsuccessful proposals included a hog farm, two military air bases, two civilian airports, and an entertainment complex larger than Disneyland? Source: Numerous within article (each of the "unsuccessful developments" sections in history).
Comment: I'm going to see how many articles I can write today. Wish me luck!
5x expanded by JPxG (talk). Self-nominated at 22:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
More than long enough, with a huge expansion (466 B/75 words to 11 kB/1789 words) occurring in one day -- the same day it was nominated. Article mentions and cites hog farm, ✓ military air bases, ✓ civilian airports, ✓ and larger-than-Disneyland entertainment complex, ✓ although the last one was buried a bit. QPQ done. Vaticidalprophet 08:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! I'd like to take this opportunity to thank @Hog Farm:, without whose sacrifice this hook would not have been possible. jp×g 10:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed (and copyedited that section overall a bit). jp×g 03:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note the abbreviation USGS for the United States Geological Survey when first mentioned.
Got it (in "Geography", could also put this in the infobox if that comes before that section). jp×g 03:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"and used at one point for oyster farming" doesn't really flow well, recommend adding a "was" after the and or splitting it into a new sentence/combining with the next one, though that's just my opinion.
Looks better now. jp×g 03:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the repetition of "the land remained undeveloped" in every single section is useful, especially when only citing something from 1955 - you could just say that in an overarching sentence under History or Unsuccessful developments, like "Many plans were proposed for the island between 1912 and 1953, but by 1955 the land was still undeveloped."
I think the repetition aids in getting the point across, but would be willing to remove it if you really want. jp×g 03:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"proposed bridge" is an WP:EASTEREGG, so consider explicitly writing San Mateo-Hayward Bridge in the link
I feel like you could include more human geography stuff, like the bridges and state route that go through it. If possible finding the population and density of the island as well might be helpful for context. I see that it seems a small portion of Brewer Island is still in San Mateo, which should probably be mentioned as well.
It could help to include the names of various water features around the island (most prominently being the lake's name "Central Lake", shown on the map but not in the prose, but also the sloughs that bound it).
Got most of it (the islands proved elusive). jp×g 01:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there really nothing relevant since 1960 when the island became developed? I feel like the article comes to an abrupt end. At the very least it seems the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge was rebuilt in the 1960s to go through the island. There are also other prominent features visible in the map not mentioned in the prose as well, like the various islands within the lake, but I understand if there are very few RSes going into detail about that kind of stuff.
I will make an effort to find some more stuff (which I think will also address the stuff about the islands in the lake, and expand some of the other history as well). jp×g 05:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I managed to find some stuff to expand the Geography section, although for some reason it proved quite hard to find anything about the little islands in the lagoon. jp×g 01:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As for the last issue (the end of the article around the construction of Foster City), I think there is kind of an interesting ontological question here. Basically, once the city was constructed on the land, that's what everyone called it. Anybody talking about the goings-on at 37°33′25″N 122°15′50″W began saying "Foster City" instead of "Brewer Island" some time in the 1960s. While Brewer Island certainly didn't stop existing per se (the land is still there, and for the most part it remains an island), it's hard to come up with a reason why any content relating to it should be here and not at Foster City. While it would of course be possible to pick a brief highlights reel of stuff that's happened in Foster City since its construction, it seems like there would be no natural cutoff point to stop it from becoming a content fork of that article. jp×g 03:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JPxG: Regarding the contentfork stuff, that's an interesting point and makes sense. I think though that events relating specifically to the land rather than the city should belong in this article, such as land-reclamation stuff (if they exist), though that's not really easy to define. I just found that the ending was a bit abrupt. There's also the issue of the northwest corner that's in San Mateo.
In any case though, how's this going? It's been almost a week on hold, and of course I can always hold it for longer, so I'd just like to remind you about this review. I understand that you are busy with other things such as the FAC and other GANs. eviolite(talk) 16:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JPxG: any updates? It's been nearly another week without edits, will have to fail the review if this continues to be the case, unfortunately. eviolite(talk) 12:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning. I would respond to this in more depth but I just spilled tea all over the damn floor so I will be a few minutes. jp×g 22:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All right, I think that about gets everything. @Eviolite: Let me know what you think. jp×g 01:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I still don't really like the repetition of "The land remained undeveloped" as the source is from over 40 years after the earliest attempt and I don't think it can directly cite "The land remained undeveloped [after 1912]" (as there could have been structures built in the ensuing years that were then demolished before 1955) - but I suppose it's fine for GA. Great work, JPxG. eviolite(talk) 06:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]