GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
1. Well written - Prose

Manual of style - No issues.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable - No issues.

3. Broad coverage - No issues.

4. Neutral - No issues.

5. Stables - No issues.

6. Images - No issues.

7. Overall - Placing on hold. Minor edits and some clarification needed on the items listed above. It almost makes me want to buy this thing on Amazon.com. Good job. Chris (talk) 14:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Responses to review

[edit]
  1. Done. - spelled out THES and OUP, as suggested above by GA Reviewer.
  2. Done. - added "its", as suggested.
  3. Done. - changed "posits", to "explains", as suggested.
  4. Done. - added info on techniques, as suggested.
  5. Done. - added when the murder spree took place, as suggested.

I believe all of the above issues have now been addressed. Thanks very much for the kind words about the article. Cirt (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]