This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bircham International University article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
In my option, this article gives undue weight to the accreditation status and reception in comparison to the content about the actual subject, such as history and operations. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @JzG: I was editing Bircham University page and was checking history and found some sources to update the page. I want to know that which info is allowed as per your suggestions? HPlilly (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I didn't understood that? You mean that you will only allow these edits if someone is paid to do the edits? Also, why referenced and true factual info is reverted?? I'll be thankful if you answer the questions above. Thank you for your participation here. I want you @JzG: valuable feedback as well since you are well versed in it. HPlilly (talk) 18:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I was not hired. I posted that project on freelancer to get a opinion because I was not well aware of Wikipedia rules on protected pages. I searched google for Wikipedia help and it directed me to freelancer. Then someone there told me to do it myself and use neutral and non-promotional tone with this page and only add verifiable information that is true. But if this needs to declared under paid and Wiki policies I can do that as I have no issues with it. This is all getting exciting and thank you for telling me all this. HPlilly (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
1 more thing is that I present the changes already so if JZG or you think they are fine please put them up again because as far as I know, anything true and verifiable is allowed on Wikipedia. Since you are taking ownership here, so I want you to guide me please. Thanks HPlilly (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
I am interested in the BIU PhD but my concern is if it would be valid in the USA. The answer they (customer service of BIU) gave me was " The degree you wish to take is not an official degree in the USA, it is a private degree that can be endorsed by the Hague Apostille to practice in the United States. I recommend that you carry out the consultation for greater security and thus proceed later to carry out the studies at Bircham." The question is where and who do I consult? 63.128.77.28 (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
On the Bircham website (with the corresponding certification posted), they claim to be members of the EADL. The EADL is the European Association for Distance Learning, and seems to be legitimately recognized by CHEA?? - google EADL and it comes up, or search on CHEA website.
Under the EADL membership directory on the EADL website, they also list BIU.
This seems to be recent, with the BIU website stating: "In 2021, Bircham International University was admitted as member of EADL, so BIU conforms to the Quality Standards of the European Association for Distance Learning".
We all know how slippery some of these online universities can be, however, if this is accurate, should this not be added to the main page? SamSam7771234 (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)