GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: John F. Lewis (talk · contribs) 22:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This looks all very good. But actually, it is not that good. When the article was shortened to suit the rules, "further reading" (originally "references") was eraded, without controlling that the text was moved to the citations. So now the citations are incomplete. I will see when I can find the time to redo this work. (Guess if I am irritated ...) Also, I don't know what were the criteria for the material that is left under "References". Why did he choose this and exclude a lot of important reports? What does he actually know about all this material? Ingrid Eckerman (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)