this article is based on real facts and i will add all the references and sources..Pethmakhama 14:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Mohsin

This article should definitely be on wikipedia because of the importance of the heritage site and a well known tourist destination178.152.30.46 (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Thomas

I visited the shrine last year. i was overwhelmed to see the rush and stunned for the name missing in wikipedia. i am happy now to see that someone has created the page of the mosque. The page still can look better. I dont think that the page needs deletion in any way.178.152.31.84 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wikipedia

I am trying my best to make the page according to the Wikipedia standards. About the deletion i suggest that the page is a very important presence on Wikipedia knowing the value of this important destination and the religious importance.Pethmakhama 07:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

This article is Good

why is this article listed in deletion category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.152.24.58 (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article is in deletion

This is a better article containing so much information about a very prominent Kashmiri figure.This should be listed as a heritage page also. The author has done a good Job. Thanks and regards.178.152.21.164 (talk) 08:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geniune article

This is a genuinely written page, however some puntuation may be needed. But the article should not have AFD because of the known importance of the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.152.20.108 (talk) 07:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isaq Dar[edit]

I think this article should be well managed and cared and also such articles should be on Wikipedia because they are very informative and it is a very very good job. thanking you..178.152.23.9 (talk) 11:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baba Payam ud Din Reshi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]