This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2023. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The contents of the Apache Bloodhound page were merged into Trac on 7 January 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This page has been created by Joachim Dreimann, a WANdisco Employee and Apache Bloodhound PMC member. Although a COI exists, I've attempted to provide a balanced view of the project which I believe is valuable for Wikipedia users and those researching the open source bug tracking software market. I have done my best to reference all statements but welcome any feedback or edits where explanations or other details appear unbalanced. Jdreimann (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to remove this banner:
And maybe add one on Conflict of Interest instead:
Any thoughts? -- Mattsenate (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Researching for my next wiki setup, I came upon Apache Bloodhound, only to discover that it appears moribund. No one has had the courtesy to acknowledge this in its Wikipedia article. While I see value in keeping the article as a historical reference, I feel the current state of the article fails to convey the important point that this software is dependent on deprecated software, is no longer safe for use from a supportability point of view, and therefore the article misrepresents it. I wrote an edit to address this, but it was reverted by one of the page's maintainers. All I reported was facts as I observed them, properly citing published meeting notes from the Apache website and reporting that support links from the Bloodhound website were all broken. This is the first time anyone has ever reverted one of my edits. I don't care if my words are used to clarify the article, but I do care that Wikipedia reflects reality on the ground. What exactly is the current support status of Apache Bloodhound? What is the Bloodhound team doing about broken support links? Will Bloodhound work in a Python 3 world by January 1, 2020? Who is taking responsibility to keep this article up to date? Who gains by having this article misrepresent the state of Bloodhound software?
Ydhirsch (talk) 03:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Doug Hirsch