This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Education Low‑importance Academic ranks (Australia and New Zealand) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. New Zealand Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Academic ranks (Australia and New Zealand). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150109032701/http://www.canberra.edu.au/hr/attachments/workplace-relations/ea-information/UC-EA-2013-2015.pdf to http://www.canberra.edu.au/hr/attachments/workplace-relations/ea-information/UC-EA-2013-2015.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wotcher,

As we all know the non-employee ranks are a f^w joke. However, there is a semantic purpose behind the distinctions between visiting, adjunct, conjoint, honorary, and emeritus and the other ones I've forgotten having been out for long enough. Basically:

• Visiting : We gave 'em library access, they're substantive elsewhere
• Adjunct : We don't quite trust 'em, they work for a living somewhere. Like an engineer working for a Car firm.
• Conjoint : They have a substantive wherein they *can* research, for example a hospital doctor, but they *also* research with us.
• Honorary : They are a bus-driver but f^w me that one book they published.
• Emeritus : THEY JUST WON'T RETIRE.

At least that's the way I remember advising my head of school (which was actually either a minifaculty or a horribly perverted department) on how to appoint people correctly. Fifelfoo (talk) 06:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]