GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GleekVampire (talk · contribs) 09:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this Good Article nomination. Nominators please be prepared to answer queries raised in the review. —GleekVampire | talk! 09:52, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links
 Done: All the references are working.Prashant talk 03:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
 Done
 Done
Plot
 Done
Production
Well, I don't think so. Seeing the article size, it may contain as many as quotes required. These quotes are details of the developments. So, they are fine.Prashant talk 18:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My word is final. Some quotes in the first paragraph can easily be paraphrased or shortened. If you don't know how to do it then get someone else to do it for you. —GleekVampire | talk! 13:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done

Will continue later. —GleekVampire | talk! 13:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack
 Done
Marketing and release
 Done
Reception
 Done.Prashant talk 18:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enough for now. Back later —GleekVampire | talk! 13:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: