19 November 2010
- 03:2703:27, 19 November 2010 diff hist +26 m User talk:Top1Percent →This is truly astounding bullshit.: For that matter!
- 03:2703:27, 19 November 2010 diff hist +669 User talk:Top1Percent →This is truly astounding bullshit.: new section
18 November 2010
- 01:4601:46, 18 November 2010 diff hist +270 m Southern strategy Horton still.
- 01:4001:40, 18 November 2010 diff hist +121 m Southern strategy →Modern appraisal in the Republican party: Michael Steele photo with caption.
- 01:3601:36, 18 November 2010 diff hist +305 Southern strategy More contemporary context for the Republican Party, including Mehlman apology and Michael Steele.
17 November 2010
- 17:3317:33, 17 November 2010 diff hist +422 Southern strategy Good NY Times source, no need for tag.
- 17:2217:22, 17 November 2010 diff hist +211 User talk:Top1Percent →Restore honor
- 17:2017:20, 17 November 2010 diff hist +253 Southern strategy More for the second paragraph.
- 17:1017:10, 17 November 2010 diff hist +53 m Southern strategy Don't know why one uses a hyphen but the other doesn't.
- 17:0817:08, 17 November 2010 diff hist +54 m Southern strategy Minor sentence wording.
- 16:5916:59, 17 November 2010 diff hist +237 Southern strategy Under, expanded 21st century use against Democrats like the Clintons.
- 16:5116:51, 17 November 2010 diff hist +191 Southern strategy Expanded 21st century meaning.
- 16:3516:35, 17 November 2010 diff hist +112 Southern strategy Turns out it was a whitewash. An anonymous IP editor deleted everything from the intro without an edit summary.
- 05:0505:05, 17 November 2010 diff hist −3 m Blue Dog Coalition →112th Congress: House caucus, not coalition.
- 05:0005:00, 17 November 2010 diff hist +49 Blue Dog Coalition Common name.
- 04:1704:17, 17 November 2010 diff hist +945 Restoring Honor rally Restored Colbert comments. The proximity and relationship between "Restoring Honor" and "Restoring Sanity/Fear" makes the commentary perfectly notable.
- 04:1204:12, 17 November 2010 diff hist −38 m Restoring Honor rally This sort of verbosity is just plain bad writing.
- 04:0404:04, 17 November 2010 diff hist +34 Southern strategy Any article or paper on the Southern strategy that doesn't include the words "race" or "Civil Rights Movement" in its introduction is a whitewash.
- 04:0004:00, 17 November 2010 diff hist −17 m Blue Dog Coalition Intro uses quotes where appropriate.
- 03:5303:53, 17 November 2010 diff hist −425 Blue Dog Coalition Removed blog post material, see WP:RS.
- 03:4603:46, 17 November 2010 diff hist −418 m Blue Dog Coalition Re-organized more subsections.
- 03:4303:43, 17 November 2010 diff hist −442 Blue Dog Coalition →Criticism: WP:OR, WP:SYNTH
- 03:4203:42, 17 November 2010 diff hist +4 m Blue Dog Coalition Subsections.
- 03:4003:40, 17 November 2010 diff hist −13 Blue Dog Coalition Sorted by Congress instead of individual year, eliminated redundancy.
- 03:1303:13, 17 November 2010 diff hist +31 N Advanced imaging technology ←Redirected page to Full body scanner current
- 03:0903:09, 17 November 2010 diff hist +340 User talk:Top1Percent →Question: Geez, still?
- 03:0503:05, 17 November 2010 diff hist +31 N Advanced Imaging Technology This is apparently the preferred newspeak term. current
4 November 2010
- 04:3004:30, 4 November 2010 diff hist +1,162 User talk:Minusjason →This is all terribly amusing
- 04:1304:13, 4 November 2010 diff hist +2,668 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Minusjason Ha, Minusjason and I are such awesome sockpuppets of each other that we just had an edit conflict!
- 03:0603:06, 4 November 2010 diff hist +494 User talk:Minusjason →This is all terribly amusing: new section
3 November 2010
- 17:3217:32, 3 November 2010 diff hist +696 Blue Dog Coalition 2010 midterm results. This whole article could use some serious expansion though.
- 16:5916:59, 3 November 2010 diff hist +245 User talk:82.135.29.209 →Explain: new section
31 October 2010
- 14:2414:24, 31 October 2010 diff hist +179 User talk:82.135.29.209 →Restoring Honor mediation: new section
- 14:2314:23, 31 October 2010 diff hist +156 N User:Top1Percent ←Created page with 'There's way too much of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clintonomics&action=historysubmit&diff=390195647&oldid=374627285 this crap] on Wikipedia.'
- 14:1814:18, 31 October 2010 diff hist +24 m Tea Party movement "their interpretation of"
24 October 2010
- 03:1103:11, 24 October 2010 diff hist +202 User talk:Top1Percent →Restoring Honor Rally
- 03:0903:09, 24 October 2010 diff hist +232 Restoring Honor rally Why tell me to join the talk page when all the discussions are old and dead? There are no discussions to join, but you keep reverting.
- 02:5902:59, 24 October 2010 diff hist +232 Restoring Honor rally All the discussions on the talk page have been dead for two weeks. The article text in the introduction right now doesn't match the sources.
- 02:1202:12, 24 October 2010 diff hist +232 Restoring Honor rally The only actual scientific estimate warrants greater weight than assorted guesses and grandstanding. 1.6 million claim is not a "media outlet" as described by the article text.
- 02:0402:04, 24 October 2010 diff hist −4 Restoring Honor rally A report ABOUT the Bachmann claim is still the Bachmann claim.
23 October 2010
- 07:1407:14, 23 October 2010 diff hist −4 Restoring Honor rally Highest media report estimated was 500,000 (Sky News reference). The 1.6 million number was a Michele Bachmann claim, not a media report.
12 October 2010
- 03:0903:09, 12 October 2010 diff hist −872 Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration →Criticisms of Clintonomics: Cut away weasel words, NPOV, undue weight.
- 02:5502:55, 12 October 2010 diff hist −4 m Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration No edit summary
- 02:5202:52, 12 October 2010 diff hist +48 Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration →Fiscal policy: I can't help but wonder if this omission was deliberate.
