12:2912:29, 16 May 2024diffhist−2,610
Economy of India
no need to mention historical data twice, as it already mentioned in the history section of the article under the British era (1793–1947) section. Also the sources you provided of the "fastest growing economy" those sources are quite old. please provide the latest available source.Tag: Undo
06:4506:45, 4 May 2024diffhist+327
Economy of India
lead is for current events not for historical events hence shifted to history section + gfcf & consumption data included
17:3217:32, 9 April 2024diffhist−18,039
Trinamool Congress
explained in talk page why it shouldn't added as a separate section rather it can be added in other sections. come to talk page for discussion.Tags: UndoReverted
07:4007:40, 9 April 2024diffhist−8,131
Nationalist Congress Party
Having a separate controversies section in articles isn't ideal. Instead, the pertinent issues should be addressed within the relevant sections of the individual's career articles, rather than consolidating them into a section that may incite negativity.Tag: Reverted
07:3007:30, 9 April 2024diffhist−8,331
Samajwadi Party
Having a separate controversies section in articles isn't ideal. Instead, the pertinent issues should be addressed within the relevant sections of the individual's career articles, rather than consolidating them into a section that may incite negativity.
07:2007:20, 9 April 2024diffhist−18,039
Trinamool Congress
Having a separate controversies section in articles isn't ideal. Instead, the pertinent issues should be addressed within the relevant sections of the individual's career articles, rather than consolidating them into a section that may incite negativity.Tag: Reverted