13:2513:25, 22 August 2011diffhist+3,234
Itô calculus
It's not a single purpose account, if you bother to check. But, since when did facts matter to you? you just remove facts you don't like. RV to correct non misleading section. RV to JoshLev247.
18:1918:19, 18 August 2011diffhist+69
Itô calculus
RV to the historically accurate account. "One" did not define the QCD of a semim wrt BM, and derive the corresponding different. theory, Allouba is the only one who did and publ. in 2006 and the historically accurate account has to be maintained.
22:1522:15, 16 August 2011diffhist+3,234
Itô calculus
RV. That's misleading. Many have supported it, even after your "independent review", including Sullivan.t.j who rewrote the Allouba's quadratic covar. differentiation theory section. All's QCD IS most relevant to many.
21:2321:23, 16 August 2011diffhist+3,234
Itô calculus
RV. You don't have any problems with leaving the mart. rep as a ``formal'' definition of the der but have all kinds of problems including Allouba's rigorous der (or even reference), which respectable experts already made the case for its inclusion.
11:5511:55, 16 August 2011diffhist+3,234
Itô calculus
Revert. The many people who are for the inclusion of Allouba's QCD have already made a much stronger case. It should be included and should not be removed.
15 August 2011
16:2516:25, 15 August 2011diffhist+3,234
Itô calculus
RV to Dmb000006, June 28. RV to Sullivan.t.j accurate well-written "differentiation in Ito's calculus" section containing Allouba's quadratic covar. differentiation theory, which for many is most certainly noteworthy for inclusion in this page.