23:4623:46, 10 April 2022diffhist−285
Tomahawk (missile)
Removed unreliable source - "lostarmour" is a personal political propaganda blog which itself does not use any reliable sources of information
23:4023:40, 10 April 2022diffhist−335
T-64
Removed unreliable source - "lostarmour" is a personal political propaganda blog which itself does not use any reliable sources of information.
15:4015:40, 8 April 2022diffhist−119
Bayraktar TB2
Removed unreliable source - "lostarmour" is a personal blog (with very obvious bias) which itself does not use any reliable sources of information.
06:5606:56, 3 June 2021diffhist+204
Battlefield V
Undid revision 1025947441 by Ferret (talk) This is not an opinion, it is a fact that there will be no USSR faction in any form since support for content releases has ended last year. And there is a proper source which I will add, with game producer promising all that before game release.Tags: UndoReverted
02:2202:22, 27 January 2021diffhist+176
Camelot Unchained
Added another necessary ref. The article should have enough references now, more are always appreciated with proper citation from reliable sources.
06:5306:53, 24 January 2021diffhist+1,806
Camelot Unchained
Adding in new section with all information about funding that CSE has received for developing this game as well as other games, backed by reliable third-party sources.
20:4120:41, 30 November 2020diffhist+1,770
Camelot Unchained
Adding in important section. It should probably be posted in separate article about City State Entertainment but such article does not exist and this section is related directly to Camelot Unchained because refunds are being requested for backing this game and this is a notable event covered by reliable sources.
05:1405:14, 20 July 2019diffhist+588
User talk:Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom
→The Tech Report: pointing out the real reason this user is trying to WP:PA myself, using policies which this user has 0 clue about, with 0 useful contribution to the article itself. I wonder what's next, will I be blamed for "Conflict of Interest" if I will remove or add more info to articles about Twitch streamers after mentioning that I am a fan of some of them?
02:4502:45, 20 July 2019diffhist−413
The Tech Report
→Community and Forum: I am sorry, but WP:RS still applies and forums are not a reliable source of information even when mentioned by Secondary Source, especially since author of New Yorker article makes false claim about forum users being "expert" without even mentioning in which field they are "experts" or how the author came to this conclusion