03:1103:11, 7 February 2022diffhist−182
Coyote Calhoun
I explain this decision in talk. I understand the motion for deletion really, but I'd rather see the article improved. I also feel like there needs to be a better metric on "notability" if there can be one. Long term radio personalities, not unlike movie or TV stars, probably should have an assumed notability.Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
19:0019:00, 5 February 2021diffhist+16
Bird Global
→Accidents and deaths: Reference link has examples that do not mention specifically Bird (other scooter brands exist). Also operator negligence appears to be a factor in some of the accidents (for example not wearing a helmet) ergo saying 'bird is responsible' is not accurate nor correct. This phrasing represents the reference link (and truth) better.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
18:1618:16, 4 August 2018diffhist+8,364
Stockholm syndrome
Do not delete large sections of articles without discussion on the talk page. So, before you "Try it again" again, discuss it on the talk page and develop WP:Con. Experienced Wikipedians should know better, Maybe it's because they are so active that they become outright arrogant and dismissive of other's contributions. In any event, it kinda flies in the face of accepted Wikipedia policy. This section does require work, not outright deletion.Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
03:4603:46, 4 August 2018diffhist+2
Talk:Sarah Jeong
Saying that this comment is original research is s bald faced lie and the editor who did so needs to be held account for that. In any case, I have added another reference and have two more ready to go even though this is *just* the talk section.Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
05:1605:16, 29 July 2018diffhist+14 m
NEWater
Pretty obvious internal link needed to find out more about Singapore and its geographic/natural or lack thereof of water resources. Can not address the old banners atm.Tag: 2017 wikitext editor