03:3103:31, 22 April 2014diffhist−1,085
Derwick Associates
Already wrote on the talk section. Nonetheless I wont accept a reversion of my edit which is completely unjustified. Like you say, please lets continue this on the talk page and stop reverting without any cause.
03:2903:29, 22 April 2014diffhist+176 N
User talk:27.122.12.79
←Created page with 'Ok, here I am, so what´s wrong with my edit? I just said legal matters should be left in the legal section instead of scattered all over the article like you ar...'
03:2003:20, 22 April 2014diffhist−1,101
Derwick Associates
I don´t see you see discussing your edits in the talk section prior to making them. So I ask you again, please stop reverting my edits since they are coherent and well justified.
03:1503:15, 22 April 2014diffhist−1,101
Derwick Associates
This is absurd. 27.122.12.* I´m not making any reversion, I´m just trying to put some balance and order into this article. I can discuss whatever you want but stop reversing my changes.
16:0916:09, 21 April 2014diffhist−207
Últimas Noticias
Removing sentence. This sentence is based on an proof-less accusation which has been publicly denied by all parties involved.
15:1615:16, 21 April 2014diffhist−725
Diosdado Cabello
Removing section. This section is based on an proofless accusation which has been publicly denied by all parties involved.Tag: section blanking