15:0015:00, 23 November 2022diffhist−1,657
Dialects of Polish
city dialects are classified according to the region they belong to; the others enumerated in this section are sociolects or jargons, not dialects (in Polish one word might be used to mean either, hence the confusion)
14:3114:31, 23 November 2022diffhist+1
Lechitic languages
Undid revision 1123391132 by 85.193.214.62 (talk) Silesian descends from Old Polish just like the other Polish dialects; genetically it’s actually the least distinct one (it shares most isoglosses with Lesser Poland); just because it „seems” to you this way doesn’t make it trueTag: Undo
12:0312:03, 23 November 2022diffhist+22
Szadzenie
Undid revision 1110648235 by 87.115.190.116 (talk) sibilants are also fricatives; coronal non-sibilant fricatives are much less common than coronal sibilants; [θ] and [ð] can be alveolar just as much as they can be dental, so why the different treatment? because they are placed in the IPA table this way? s and z are called dental or coronal in Polish Slavistic literature everywhere I lookTag: Undo
10:3010:30, 23 November 2022diffhist−1,163
Palatalization (phonetics)
I am removing this because the first paragraph about the meaning of this word in Slavic linguistics because: 1) it is unsourced 2) it confuses the terms „palatal” and „palatalized” 3) it falsely states that palato-alveolars are not palatalized – they are, albeit lightly, so I’m removing it tooand a distinction is made in Slavic linguistics between them and the „retroflex” (flat postalveolars) 4) it is plain wrong in the statement about Russian; the second paragraph depends on the first so