16:2716:27, 16 December 2015diffhist−611
Chai Vang
Undid revision 692094204 by WilliamThweatt William is POV-pushing, including misleading and biased info and clearly not understanding that ALL minority and majority views must be included.
18:4818:48, 23 November 2015diffhist−611
Chai Vang
Undid revision. It is misleading and WP:UNDUE has no relevance here. WilliamThweatt diddn't consult on talk page. There was 2 confrontations, not one. Plenty of other sources and the court transcript itself state differently than what William states.
09:3809:38, 13 November 2015diffhist+3,596
Chai Vang
False claims of the information that I inserted were just " rumors" that had no sources which I linked the sources in the talk page
05:0005:00, 13 November 2015diffhist+3,596
Chai Vang
Undid the revision. Frankly, although it might have looked sloppy. A simple rewrite and rewording would make it " professional." My sources are in the talk page. Please don't just claim this information as " rumors" when it's clearly not.
11:5911:59, 12 November 2015diffhist+3,460
Chai Vang
Added a whole lot of significant details that wasn't included that made this article misleading, satisfying neutral pov. If i made any errors in my change, please correct, rewrite or rephrase to make it appropriate.Tag: Visual edit