06:0006:00, 1 February 2013diffhist−979
Existentialism
a blanket statement that completely contradicts the previous sentence (if they differ profoundly, how can such a vague, single criticism apply to them all)?? This needs to be replaced with something more precise, concrete and specific
21:3721:37, 15 April 2012diffhist−90
Lactose intolerance
this map has no reference whatsoever and everybody has pointed out time and again in the talk (see talk) that some of the data here is completely absurd, so it should be removed
20:5620:56, 30 November 2011diffhist−25
Great Vowel Shift
partial revert - both High German and Low German have many dialects that resisted the change; the very examples mentioned here attest that
29 November 2011
23:1023:10, 29 November 2011diffhist0
Proto-Indo-European phonology
Revert - the name palatals/palatovelars is traditional, and the phonemic status of many of these in PIE is questionable anyway. Still, the article is contradictory on the velar/post-velar issue and the mess needs to be cleaned
06:0906:09, 1 October 2011diffhist+25
Corruption (linguistics)
From a linguistc pov, this article is plagued by speculative garbage & should either be deleted or corrected by an expert with the time to do it. Some passages here are an embarassement to Wikipedia. What's more, the subject "changes" all the time!
13 September 2011
23:2523:25, 13 September 2011diffhist−75
Peace
RM. The documentation for this picture in commons is not very clear and its importance to the article (alongside pics with far more historical significance) is even less so
8 June 2011
06:1806:18, 8 June 2011diffhist+316
Canadian raising
RV blanking Anon. All those objections are already in the text (and in a more encyclopedic tone). Please, read it again.
21:0021:00, 27 May 2011diffhist+10
Pan-Africanism
HORRIBLE amero-euro-centric article, horrible! It totally fails to describe the quite important and influential pan-african political movement in AFRICA itself! How could wikipedia miss it?
21:1721:17, 19 September 2010diffhist−1,061
Centum and satem languages
Self-revert. Never mind. I was going to write a reply on the talk page, but on second thoughts I agree it should be removed (although I disagree with some of your claims there)
09:0609:06, 3 August 2010diffhist−182
Centum and satem languages
Ok, but the previous version says essentially the same thing as this one, is less POV and more concise. No need to highlight your favorite theory when it is already mentioned anyway.
21:2621:26, 20 September 2008diffhist−481
Verner's law
This is utter nonsense - both "groups" are obstruents, and it makes sense to unify the changes as a [+voice] rule. A similar change affecting only fricatives is far more unlikely.