15:1915:19, 24 November 2023diffhist+2,552
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
Very unlikely? Muslim rule till British invasion is likely? Muslim rule vanished a century before the Britishers even arrived. And what do you mean by higher source? I used 1 contemporary eye witness as a source and jadunath sarkaar along with tabakat i nasiri and firishta as well as Nicholas manucci. What else do you need? And we have already took this to the talk page and no one even responded.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
03:0103:01, 24 November 2023diffhist−296
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
And stop it already. 60-70 million people dying in medieval times because of mere invasions is impossible. Your own article says that this claim is highly unreliable and Romila thappar and Audrey Truschke clearly call this claim false as well. So stop this vandalism.Tags: Revertedreferences removedMobile editMobile web edit
02:5502:55, 24 November 2023diffhist+1
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
Firstyl Neither the grammar in your military box is correct secondly nor it provides any citations. I have used contemporary citations even the citations of jadunath. Thirdly change this to invasion. Because it was never a permanent conquest. And hindu reconquest did take place which you didnt even mention.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
02:5102:51, 24 November 2023diffhist+2,547
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
Disrupting? I can even report you at this point. What you are doing is vandalism. Do you know that even the grammar in your military box isnt correct. It doesnt cover hindu reconquests and even doesnt have any citations. So changing it is must. If you have problems, take it to the talk section.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:2318:23, 23 November 2023diffhist+1
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
So yes. Stop this vandalism. Neither your military box is even grammatically correct nor it has any citations whatsoever nor it includes all conflicts. It only uses citations in casuality and even that citation is weak, ur own article says that Audrey Truschke and Indian historian Romila Thapar find this false.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:1918:19, 23 November 2023diffhist+1
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
And yes. Firstly Your page is supposed to show the muslim conflicts with all religions in india. Which literally includes hinduism, buddhism, sikhism etc. But it mostly includes conflicts with Hindus and only those conflicts which muslims mostly won. Secondly Your military box is biased because you only included islamic conquests with no aftermath. The aftermath is something we all know. The gradual hindu reconquests which lasted till British east india company. Thirdly your grammar in the m...Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
18:1418:14, 23 November 2023diffhist+2,010
Muslim conquests in the Indian subcontinent
You have absolutely no right to change it. Even the grammar in your military box isnt correct. I have changed the military box accordance to the the proper reliable sources. The article is supposed to include all of hindu-Muslim conflicts. Which obviously includes hindu reconquest. Ur military box has no sources or even proper citations. It needs to be changed. If u want to rechange it then head over to the talk sessionTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit