14:0914:09, 29 March 2024diffhist−48
StoneToss
Agree with GranCavallo this is an "awkward way to phrase this." Change wordy and redundant "political cartoon series in the form of an eponymous webcomic" to just "self-titled webcomic"Tag: Visual edit
00:1000:10, 28 March 2024diffhist−1,941
StoneToss
Restore "Neo-nazi" description based on reliable sources. Remove unsourced "often criticizing Progressivism" description that is apparently a wikipedia editor's point of view and/or original research. This is a biography of a lliving person. It is not the place for unsourced or poorly sourced editing.Tags: Manual revertReverted
14:1514:15, 26 March 2024diffhist+33
StoneToss
Adding quote marks and attribution. Neither source says these Nazi comics are humorous, and both put "humor" in quotes. They say "much more sinister than the 'edgy humor' their creator says they are" and "racist, sexist tropes veiled in 'edgy humor.'”Tag: Visual edit
15:0415:04, 23 March 2024diffhist+14
StoneToss
Adding "far right" to infobox. Cited source says "Nazi cartoonist," "far right political cartoonist," "holocaust denial" etc., so it is inaccurate to describe this as simply "political." See talk page.Tag: Visual edit
00:0900:09, 23 March 2024diffhist+8
StoneToss
Sources describe this as "Neo-Nazi", "racist, homophobic, and antisemitic" not simply "political satire"Tag: Reverted