Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:0402:04, 26 December 2018 diff hist −1,314‎ Aquaman (film) ‎ →‎Critical response: It's fine to include negative reviews. But don't include the most extreme-negative unprofessional ones. All the negative reviews out there talk about the plot or tone, NOT about "crummy CGI" like the one I deleted. Be professional about this. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21:2021:20, 24 December 2018 diff hist −1,543‎ Aquaman (film) ‎ →‎Reception: The Chicago Tribune review is the most insulting one, and it's not informative or indicative of general concensus. The Entertainment Weekly review is totally outside of general concensus in saying there is "crummy CGI". Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

02:4302:43, 17 April 2014 diff hist +387‎ User talk:AndyTheGrump ‎ →‎As per your 3/13 comment on my talk page...: new section

19:0619:06, 30 March 2014 diff hist −511‎ Talk:Cougar ‎ →‎Apex Predator ?
19:0219:02, 30 March 2014 diff hist +511‎ Talk:Cougar ‎ →‎Apex Predator ?: new section

02:2202:22, 24 February 2014 diff hist +1,143‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: BigCat82 is now falsely accusing another user as being associated with me.

20:2520:25, 12 February 2014 diff hist +474‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Telling the admins that I will not respond to BigCat82 (my main accuser) anymore.
18:5218:52, 12 February 2014 diff hist +750‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Comment on my appeal being denied.

23:3023:30, 11 February 2014 diff hist +1,023‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: One more comment on my appeal being denied.
23:1423:14, 11 February 2014 diff hist +863‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: My reaction to my appeal being denied.

17:3817:38, 4 February 2014 diff hist +688‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Response to BigCat82's allegations.
15:3915:39, 4 February 2014 diff hist +995‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Added one more statement to my appeal of being blocked.
15:2115:21, 4 February 2014 diff hist +113‎ m User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Minor edit. Just submitted my appeal a few seconds ago but forgot to sign it. It says my name, but I better sign it anyway.
15:1915:19, 4 February 2014 diff hist +2,185‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: My appeal message on getting blocked.
05:0705:07, 4 February 2014 diff hist +90‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Golden Prime ‎ →‎Comments by other users: Added one sentence to clarify something.
04:5104:51, 4 February 2014 diff hist +402‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Golden Prime ‎ →‎Comments by other users: One more comment in my defense.
04:3804:38, 4 February 2014 diff hist +1,262‎ Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Golden Prime ‎ →‎Comments by other users: My response to allegations that I have 2 accounts.
01:4101:41, 4 February 2014 diff hist −5‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: Sorry, dang LOL, it's still not worded right. The word 'poll' is in the sentence twice. Minor edit. Removing the word 'poll'.
01:3901:39, 4 February 2014 diff hist +550‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: Just wondering what I'm being accused of exactly. I did NOT use more than one username.
01:2101:21, 4 February 2014 diff hist +13‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: After the revert and stuff, the wording was off on the one thing that was left in. I simply added the word 'In'....and I added the words 'of All Time' because that's the exact wording in the Parade poll.
01:1201:12, 4 February 2014 diff hist −229‎ m Talk:Aquaman ‎ →‎Rankings by third parties: When signing, the auto-sign thing popped up. Just signing, minor change.
01:0801:08, 4 February 2014 diff hist +839‎ Talk:Aquaman ‎ →‎Rankings by third parties: Question on to why sales figures and social media popularity are not allowed in the 'Reception and Legacy' category.
00:4700:47, 4 February 2014 diff hist +1‎ m User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: Minor edit - added a space between my 2 comments.
00:4600:46, 4 February 2014 diff hist +355‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: Info on who reverted my other edit from another page from the past. Timing has me wondering if it's retaliation. Could be a coincidence.
00:3800:38, 4 February 2014 diff hist −4‎ m User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: 2 minor typo's
00:3600:36, 4 February 2014 diff hist +890‎ User talk:EasyTherePilgrim ‎ →‎Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts: I strongly deny these allegations. It appears to be retaliation for trying to edit the 'Tiger versus Lion' page.

18:5218:52, 3 February 2014 diff hist +108‎ User talk:BigCat82 ‎ →‎lion v tiger
18:5218:52, 3 February 2014 diff hist −337‎ User talk:BigCat82 ‎ →‎lion v tiger
18:4918:49, 3 February 2014 diff hist +387‎ User talk:BigCat82 ‎ →‎lion v tiger
18:3518:35, 3 February 2014 diff hist +401‎ Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion ‎ →‎Lion vs. Tiger: new section

18:3218:32, 1 February 2014 diff hist +2‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: Minor error on something I just submitted. I used quotation marks instead of 2 apostrophes.
18:2718:27, 1 February 2014 diff hist +24‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: Minor edit on something I added yesterday. Just linked the word 'Parade' to the corresponding Parade magazine Wikipedia page.

23:3323:33, 31 January 2014 diff hist +352‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: Adding one short sentence with a link, telling what Parade Magazine is. I listed their superhero poll yesterday....so now I'm just noting that Parade is the most widely read magazine in the U.S.
00:2600:26, 31 January 2014 diff hist +1,038‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: 'Ranking' of 147 or even 52 does not give a complete picture. I added sales figures, social media figures, DC's own 'ranking', and another poll.

23:3923:39, 28 December 2013 diff hist −1‎ m Talk:Aquaman ‎ →‎Rankings by third parties: Just corrected a punctuation mark in my post.
23:1923:19, 28 December 2013 diff hist +773‎ Talk:Aquaman ‎ →‎Rankings by third parties: My response to guys that think 3rd Party Rankings are relevant. I will leave them in, but I strongly disagree. A Wikipedia page should be information, not opinion.

21:4121:41, 27 December 2013 diff hist +666‎ Talk:Aquaman ‎ →‎Rankings by third parties: Response to comment on 3rd party rankings. Credibility, etc.
19:5819:58, 27 December 2013 diff hist −863‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: I am in an edit war. I demand that the 'rankings' by an out-of-business magazine (Wizard) and IGN (which is simply one of a hundred different comic websites) be removed. Misleading & irrelevant. Not concensus opinion!
04:1204:12, 27 December 2013 diff hist −863‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: I am in an edit war. I demand that the 'rankings' by an out-of-business magazine (Wizard) and IGN (which is simply one of a hundred different comic websites) be removed. Misleading & irrelevant. Not concensus opinion!

06:5806:58, 25 December 2013 diff hist −863‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy
05:1405:14, 25 December 2013 diff hist −863‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy
05:0905:09, 25 December 2013 diff hist −858‎ Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: I removed the theoretical 'ranking' given by Wizard Magazine and IGN. They are no more an authority than dozens of other more well known publications. In fact Wizard Magazine is out of business.
04:4104:41, 25 December 2013 diff hist −924‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: I'm removing this because it's totally irrelevant. Wizard Magazine and IGN are not in any way close to being authorities on this subject. Tag: section blanking

07:5907:59, 21 December 2013 diff hist −640‎ m Aquaman ‎ →‎Reception and legacy: I removed the #147 ranking by Wizard Magazine, and the #53 ranking by IGN. These 'rankings' are totally irrelevant, misleading, biased, and meaningless. My sources are the DC website (dccomics.com), the DC Encyclopedia...