20 April 2024
- 18:0918:09, 20 April 2024 diff hist −222 Popcorn US consumption about a million pounds per year (later in article), a couple of 10 thousands more is not aamatic increase.
28 January 2024
- 07:0807:08, 28 January 2024 diff hist 0 Ingenuity (helicopter) I think this is what is meant.
10 January 2024
- 05:1305:13, 10 January 2024 diff hist −37 Sabatier reaction Nm^3 does not exist; N is not an SI prefix, and the reference does not quote 6 m^3 or anything like it.
25 December 2023
- 13:3713:37, 25 December 2023 diff hist +497 Talk:The Partridge Family →Laurie Partridge father gets drunk??: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:3113:31, 25 December 2023 diff hist −73 The Partridge Family Removed sentence that makes no sense and has no reference. See talk page
19 December 2023
- 06:5406:54, 19 December 2023 diff hist −40 User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff No edit summary current
- 06:3706:37, 19 December 2023 diff hist +660 User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff →December 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:2206:22, 19 December 2023 diff hist +812 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 No edit summary
- 06:1306:13, 19 December 2023 diff hist −254 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 I submit this as a compromise.
- 05:5905:59, 19 December 2023 diff hist +517 Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 No edit summary
- 05:3905:39, 19 December 2023 diff hist +692 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 Undid revision 1190662605 by Foonix0 (talk) The overkill was spacex gaslighting the world by saying it was a success when it was not. The flight did NOT fulfill it's objectives --> not a success. It says in THIS VERY ARTICLE that the objectives were not fulfulled. Tag: Undo
18 December 2023
- 15:4415:44, 18 December 2023 diff hist +356 Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 →Mission success: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:3615:36, 18 December 2023 diff hist +622 Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 →Mission success: Reply Tag: Reply
17 December 2023
- 23:5523:55, 17 December 2023 diff hist +49 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 The flight objectives are given in this Wikipedia article - first paragraph and enumerated below the first photo. Below the first photo it says explicitly the ones that were not met. This is a fact reported in this article. Tag: Reverted
- 19:5419:54, 17 December 2023 diff hist +496 Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 →Mission success: new section Tag: New topic
- 19:5219:52, 17 December 2023 diff hist +35 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 Undid revision 1190410763 by Redacted II (talk) See talk page Tags: Undo Reverted
16 December 2023
- 16:0616:06, 16 December 2023 diff hist 0 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 16:0516:05, 16 December 2023 diff hist +121 SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2 It was not ultimately successful, though a good successful test. Successful flight means the flight objectives were met - they were not in this case. Tag: Reverted
- 15:1915:19, 16 December 2023 diff hist −92 Sophie Anderson (actress) No reference at all, and not very probable either.
- 15:1715:17, 16 December 2023 diff hist +492 Talk:Sophie Anderson (actress) →30 men per day: new section Tag: New topic
- 15:1415:14, 16 December 2023 diff hist −529 Sophie Anderson (actress) This unreliable reference is an offhand remark from her to a newspaper reporter. The numbers mean she slept with more than 30 men per day, highly improbable.
12 December 2023
- 06:0006:00, 12 December 2023 diff hist +6 Plutonium hexafluoride Small change but much more accurate now.
10 December 2023
- 06:2906:29, 10 December 2023 diff hist −563 Sophie Anderson (actress) The reference is an offhand remark to a newspaper reporter. The numbers mean she slept with more than 10 men per day, 365 days in each year since she turned 16. I think not.
8 December 2023
- 05:4505:45, 8 December 2023 diff hist −6 Explorer S-46 (satellite) More accurate description
- 00:2000:20, 8 December 2023 diff hist +5 Friday the 13th About 1 part in 700.
6 December 2023
- 03:1303:13, 6 December 2023 diff hist +573 Talk:Earnest Andersson →Stravinsky's work: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:5202:52, 6 December 2023 diff hist +388 Talk:Earnest Andersson →Stravinsky's work: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4802:48, 6 December 2023 diff hist +770 Talk:Earnest Andersson →Stravinsky's work: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:2602:26, 6 December 2023 diff hist +554 Talk:Earnest Andersson →Stravinsky's work: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:2002:20, 6 December 2023 diff hist +233 Talk:Earnest Andersson No edit summary
- 02:1102:11, 6 December 2023 diff hist +306 Talk:Earnest Andersson →Stravinsky's work: new section Tag: New topic
- 02:0802:08, 6 December 2023 diff hist +261 User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff →December 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:0602:06, 6 December 2023 diff hist −41 Earnest Andersson No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 02:0402:04, 6 December 2023 diff hist −42 Earnest Andersson Ditto. Tag: Reverted
- 01:5301:53, 6 December 2023 diff hist −42 Earnest Andersson Listing all this is out of place here, an attempt to establish gravitas for the very shaky claims of his impact as a composer. Tag: Reverted
- 01:2701:27, 6 December 2023 diff hist −64 Earnest Andersson No references to either of these; there are millions of self taught artists in history. Any reference to the work of author Slim is very poor at best, there are no collaborating references to virtually all his claims. Tag: Reverted
- 00:5200:52, 6 December 2023 diff hist −66 Vanguard TV-3BU A bit more concise and accurate.
2 December 2023
- 22:0422:04, 2 December 2023 diff hist −248 Radon This is unclearly written, wrong and not referenced.
30 November 2023
- 20:4220:42, 30 November 2023 diff hist −88 Jack Parsons Undid revision 1187372580 by MagicatthemovieS (talk) a few latent homosexual thoughts and no actions or relationships does not qualify him. Tag: Undo
29 November 2023
- 23:5023:50, 29 November 2023 diff hist −41 Evelyn Nesbit Removed a very odd, unreferenced statement. "used intermediaries to disarm Nesbit"?? Physically, emotionally? A drugging and rape has been suggested. Unclear statement, not referenced.
28 November 2023
- 08:2108:21, 28 November 2023 diff hist +4 Boeing Boeing (1965 film) No edit summary
26 November 2023
- 05:0005:00, 26 November 2023 diff hist −13 m Sergei Korolev tidy up slightly
- 04:5104:51, 26 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Sergei Korolev Typo or transliteration problem.
- 04:4304:43, 26 November 2023 diff hist +1 Sergei Korolev slightly more concise.
- 04:3604:36, 26 November 2023 diff hist −253 Sergei Korolev He was not the father. The other Russian Tsiolkovsky was the father of astronautics; Korolev and von Braun (and likely Oberth) were the godparents/uncles/midwives as you wish.
- 04:2904:29, 26 November 2023 diff hist −3 Sergei Korolev They were pretty much equal.
- 04:1704:17, 26 November 2023 diff hist −44 Sergei Korolev "altitude would not be survivable" makes no sense. The problem was parachuting 3 crew out of the capsule, also little space for parachutes in the capsule.
- 04:1304:13, 26 November 2023 diff hist +4 Sergei Korolev Voskhod 1 predated the first manned Gemini 3.
- 03:4203:42, 26 November 2023 diff hist +2 Sergei Korolev Same as last edit
25 November 2023
- 23:3223:32, 25 November 2023 diff hist +2 Sergei Korolev he was the key.
