10:5510:55, 20 June 2024diffhist+174
Pro-Americanism
lots of incorrect details. the highly unpopular war was specifically Afghanistan #article-section-source-editorTags: Mobile editMobile app editiOS app edit
14:2314:23, 18 June 2024diffhist−1
California exodus
no credible sources state that the exodus is over. 1 year of growth could very well be an aberration. Hence, unless a source states that the exodus is over/ 2024 data shows california's population rose again, it's best to keep it to 'is'. or start a discussion in the talk page if you feel so strongly about making such a change
17 June 2024
08:0108:01, 17 June 2024diffhist−32 m
September 11 attacks
waged is a better term to use here than instigated, which sounds way too indirect for the context of fighting a far. Furthermore, removed the redundant use of they
23:5923:59, 16 June 2024diffhist+153
Motives for the September 11 attacks
This article's lede does a really poor job of highlighting the extremist beliefs and reasons for perpetrating mass murder of this maniac. his casual mention of such basic tenets of a free life as being reasons for a terrorist attack highlight the inherent hatred and violence that served as motives for the attack. But for some reason these were barely mentioned in the article. so now it's given more importance right up there in the lede, like it deserves
23:3023:30, 16 June 2024diffhist+130
September 11 attacks
The single image montage is of decidedly poorer quality than the long standing collection of images and the single image also redirected the hover preview to a low quality zoomed out photo from the collection of articles rather than this article itself. Kindly improve the dimensions of the montage by choosing a wider fit, or let this collection of images stayTags: UndoReverted
22:4922:49, 16 June 2024diffhist+966
Republican Party (United States)
the foreign policy section of this lede has multiple sources backing it up + the sectionalism section's source makes no mention of 2008, while the history of the GOP demonstrates constant factionalism throughout its historyTag: Reverted
22:3522:35, 16 June 2024diffhist−5
Democratic Party (United States)
Congressional voting records, statements by democratic congressmembers, and democrat voter attitudes show that they quite clearly are not. i don't know why you're trying to die on this hill. there's nothing inherently positive or negative about this, it's just a fact that the democrats have become less supportive of Israel, albeit being more supportive historicallyTags: UndoReverted
22:3322:33, 16 June 2024diffhist+1,454
Democratic Party (United States)
While I've agreed with the removal of the economics section update due to a lack of concrete sources saying that, your reverts of the 'voters with positive attitudes towards socialism' and 'factions : socialism' parts seem very counter-intuitive, and frankly, silly. both those changed make perfect sense, do not generalize the democrats as a whole, but simply mention a faction who are part of the democratic coalition, and have loads of sources backing them up.Tag: Reverted
21:1621:16, 16 June 2024diffhist+262
Republican Party (United States)
An additional comment on how the longstanding tendency of the Republican to factionalize has led to leaders who successfully unified the party (as mentioned previously in the lede re: silent majority and three legged stool) to win power nationally, while those who failed to do so like taft in the 1910s or goldwater in 60s
21:0821:08, 16 June 2024diffhist+12
Republican Party (United States)
The 5 factions article is not about the party since 2008, and the Republican party has faced high levels of factionalism since Day 1. cases in point : Radical Republicans vs the rest of the republicans, Taft Sr. vs Teddy, Taft Jr vs Eisenhower/Dewey, Rocky vs Goldwater and then finally post 2008 Tea Party vs Establishment, and now MAGA vs establishment