02:4902:49, 21 July 2021diffhist+5
Khamr
The word khamr isn’t repeated in that Hadith. Rather the word intoxicant is repeated.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
02:0902:09, 21 July 2021diffhist+283
Mu'awiya I
I’ve added the citation. Check the Talk page for proof. The Book of Tang cannot be ignored. Stop with the lies.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
02:0602:06, 21 July 2021diffhist+299
Mu'awiya I
Everyone check the Talk page. Quote has been given from the Book of Tang, proving the Byzantines paid tribute to the Arabs after the siege.Tags: UndoReverted
22:4422:44, 20 July 2021diffhist−40
Mu'awiya I
From my research it is clear both sides paid some sort of tribute. The Book of Tang (I have given the source) also says the Byzantines paid tribute and gave gold and silk to the Arabs. So I’ve left it as a truce, to be neutral. It wouldn’t make sense to leave it as only one side paying to the other. The Book of Tang cannot be ignored here.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
06:2506:25, 18 July 2021diffhist−65
Umayyad Caliphate
→Social organization: Just because they held themselves to be higher it doesn’t mean they were racist or going against the teachings of Islam. It was natural because they had the status and were the rulers.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit