21:4321:43, 8 September 2019diffhist−545
Navel
→Forms: That study isn't representative of the general population and the way its conclusions are represented here contradict the general situation.Tag: references removed
21:2821:28, 31 August 2019diffhist+345
Hedgehog slice
Tried to re-structure a bit and add some history. Please check de:Schokoladensalami, de:Kalter Hund and nl:Arretjescake for more information and sources.
15:1515:15, 2 July 2019diffhist+120
Akan languages
There's so much wrong with that map and it's only tangentially related to the topic at hand. Let's use a better picture. I formatted it so it will sit next to the contents if the page is wide enough.
22:0422:04, 1 July 2019diffhist+782
Akan languages
It isn't particularly clear to me how to derive the stated number from the source cited, and I suspect it may have led to both double-counting and skipping. I don't like to cite Ethnologue because of the unprofessional way it handles figures, so I'm replacing the figure with figures from UNdata and Jacques Leclerc.
20:2520:25, 30 June 2019diffhist−93
Mazanderani people
Reverting edits by Iran.mihan. 1) ahouraa.ir is not a reliable source and 2) it doesn't match the content added to the articleTag: references removed
11:1211:12, 16 June 2019diffhist−42
R rotunda
That image isn't very representative of how the r rotunda looked most of the time and it's also redundant with the images below.
23:3423:34, 13 June 2019diffhist−66
Central Kilimanjaro language
Ethnologue is not a reliable source. I finally managed to track down the reference for the figure that was on E'gue when it was added here, and it turned out to be an advertising / fundraising brochure for the United Bible Societies' 100 Bible Translations project. It was missing from E'gue's bibliography to hide this fact. E'gue has since been updated, but if the source of their new figures is reliable, we should cite that, not E'gue. E'gue is not a reliable source.
12:5012:50, 13 June 2019diffhist−109
Colognian
I've tried very hard to track down Ethnologue's reference, but it probably doesn't exist as such. I've also noticed in the past that Ethnologue is not a reliable source.
17:4117:41, 27 May 2019diffhist−65
N'Ko language
‘This entry has been retired and is featured here only for bookkeeping purposes. Either the entry has been replaced with one or more more accurate entries or it has been retired because it was based on a misunderstanding to begin with.’
17:0917:09, 27 May 2019diffhist−2,001
Languages of Aruba
We've already got a much better article on Papiamento and the information here is unsourced, partly of dubious quality and partly subjective. Let's remove it, there's no point having it here anyway when the other article exists.Tag: section blanking
26 May 2019
07:2907:29, 26 May 2019diffhist+223
Javanese script
→Aksara: I don't have the time to check the other places where this proposal is cited; I'm putting it back in at this location to fix the error message in the reference list.
07:2207:22, 26 May 2019diffhist−15
Javanese script
→History: And the Unicode proposal should be removed as a reference here as well, for the same reason. I'm not saying the information contained is wrong, just as I'm not saying the information in this article is wrong. But it is not fit for the purpose of referencing this particular kind of thing.
07:1707:17, 26 May 2019diffhist−238
Javanese script
The introduction of the Unicode proposal is just meant to acquaint the reader with the general situation. Like a Wikipedia article, is not meant as an authoritative source. Even so, it doesn't even explicitly say that Latin script supplanted Javanese script for Javanese, rather that Indonesian took centre stage.Tag: references removed