20:3920:39, 18 July 2011diffhist−7
Persian
Bottom line is u have no WP:CONS for your arbitrary changes as 3 usrs already disagree w/ u. To take it a step further, FARSI+DARI+TAJIK are all PERSIAN dialects, so "Farsi" instead of "Persian" is ambigous & contradicts WP:AT
23:2123:21, 5 July 2011diffhist−7
Persian
Nothing disruptive about his edit. You need to stop your WP:EW and WP:OWN mentality & stop doing OR. "Farsi" (similar to Tajik and Dari) is the local name for "Persian", which is the generic term for the language. Iran & Persia are interchangeable.
28 June 2011
00:0500:05, 28 June 2011diffhist−4
Rasad 1
1. Local names like "SFI" or "Sazeman-e Fazai-e Iran" are irrelevant per WP:NCCN no matter how "confusing" it sounds. In English Wikipedia, we go by most commonly accepted names or terminologies used in English language. 2. "Rasad 1" -> "Rasad-1"
20:5520:55, 16 June 2011diffhist+921
2005 Ahvaz unrest
1. CN tag now replaced with an academic source. 2. MOS-related improvements. Internal links are directly linking to the proper page without any need for redirection. (minor)
11:3211:32, 16 June 2011diffhist−78
2005 Ahvaz unrest
1. punct. error corrected. 2. rm of vague statement. A connection (if any) between this unrest and Arab Spring needs published verifiable WP:RS and WP:NPOV sources. Otherwise, it's WP:OR.
07:0907:09, 16 June 2011diffhist−5
Heineken brands
It's still an ambiguous terminology. Furhermore, it's unencyclopedic. Remember, just because it's common, it doesn't mean it's encyclopedic. Examples: Bill Clinton vs Clinton, Saddam Hussein vs Saddam. Our WP:UCN policy is clear on this.
05:0505:05, 15 June 2011diffhist−249
2005 Ahvaz unrest
Rewording, Needs to be properly attributed to make things more neutral. Rm news blog site that references Saudi state-owned media. Better to avoid such sources unless we provide proper context that it's a Saudi state-owned organization.Tag: references removed
04:1804:18, 15 June 2011diffhist−36
2005 Ahvaz unrest
I'm afraid, the src is not fine. The LA Times news blog is referencing Saudi state-owned media (the primary src), which is a non-neutral src indeed. need a more reliable src. http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/04/18/145879.htmlTag: references removed