05:0305:03, 23 July 2020 diff hist −99‎ Theodor W. Adorno ‎ Since no citation has been provided for this, I feel comfortable removing it. It is a highly incendiary claim to put in the lead, and if it is referring to Adorno's writings on jazz, it completely ignores that this is only a small fraction of his musicological writing.

19:2119:21, 9 July 2020 diff hist −330‎ Simulacra and Simulation ‎ source doesn't support claim Tag: references removed
18:5218:52, 9 July 2020 diff hist −5,472‎ Talk:Detransition ‎No edit summary
18:4418:44, 9 July 2020 diff hist −1,005‎ Womxn ‎ Urban Dictionary is not a WP:RS
18:4318:43, 9 July 2020 diff hist +1,064‎ Talk:Womxn ‎No edit summary

04:0704:07, 4 July 2020 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia:Writing about women ‎ in composite forms featuring parentheses, it is the parenthesized segment whose removal or inclusion differentiates the composed items. “s(he)”, then, is nonsensical, it implies “either ‘s’ or ‘she’”.

16:3716:37, 19 June 2020 diff hist −6‎ Christina Sharpe ‎ the citations say nothing about her being “most well-known” for her authorship of these books, or even about her being “known” at all; they simply say that she wrote them.

20:4420:44, 19 May 2020 diff hist −4,201‎ Talk:Audrey Wollen ‎ Undid revision 932454126 by 71.191.208.132 (talk) Tags: Replaced Undo

21:1021:10, 29 April 2020 diff hist −9‎ Andrea Dworkin ‎ WP:NPOV
19:4219:42, 29 April 2020 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Detransition ‎No edit summary
19:3719:37, 29 April 2020 diff hist +10‎ Talk:Detransition ‎No edit summary
19:3019:30, 29 April 2020 diff hist +5,459‎ Talk:Detransition ‎ →‎Clarification needed re: activists viewing detransition as a political threat to trans rights: new section
17:2617:26, 29 April 2020 diff hist +11‎ Detransition ‎ Although this political situation may be familiar to those within trans politics, laypeople are not; hence it is important to specify a) the nature of the political threat activists perceive detransition to pose and b) the rationale behind those beliefs. This is a controversial yet important issue, and the cited texts unfortunately mostly don't go into enough detail to furnish the kinds of specific statements that are necessary when describing complex conflicts between opposing viewpoints.

23:2523:25, 5 April 2020 diff hist +18‎ Metapedia ‎ Grammar (holocaust denial is not an adjective)

21:0921:09, 6 March 2020 diff hist −57‎ Philosophical movement ‎ Objectivism qua school of (ostensible) thought is incredibly insular, has nothing like a canon or milieu extending past one person and her sycophants, exerts virtually no influence in academic philosophical practice, and has nowhere near the quantity or quality of scholarship as the other movements listed here insofar as they are well-defined (“modernism”? what?). If it were to remain on this list, things like Integralism would have to be added alongside it.
20:5520:55, 6 March 2020 diff hist −14‎ Philosophical movement ‎ Atheism is not a ‘contemporary philosophical movement’. The absence of faith has existed since faith has.

01:2701:27, 3 March 2020 diff hist −457‎ Politics ‎No edit summary Tag: references removed
01:2401:24, 3 March 2020 diff hist +521‎ Talk:Politics ‎No edit summary

21:2021:20, 20 February 2020 diff hist +15‎ Transmedicalism ‎ the source, a blog post about youtube e-celeb drama, is far too tendentious and concerns far too obscure a subject matter to warrant the use of the passive voice, which suggests some sort of broad consensus or generally accepted sentiment.
21:0121:01, 20 February 2020 diff hist −339‎ Carbon accounting ‎ As far as I know, Haraway has not written about carbon accounting, and if she has, it hasn't been cited. Nor can I find any reliable secondary source about 'using' her 'concept' in this context. So this would appear to be a pretty egregious case of WP:OR or WP:SYNTH from some over-eager STS student.