25 May 2023

• 23:2923:29, 25 May 2023 diff hist +1,941‎ Fundamental theorems of welfare economics ‎ →‎Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu (separately, 1951): request for clarification, style of section is also confusing, especially without primary sources making the claims more precisely to compare against

20 May 2023

• 04:4804:48, 20 May 2023 diff hist +59‎ Complete Boolean algebra ‎ →‎Properties of complete Boolean algebras: section includes some nontrivial claims that are not easily verified

11 May 2023

• 00:0000:00, 11 May 2023 diff hist +853‎ Qubit ‎ →‎Bit versus qubit: request clarification because there appears to be an unclear or false claim

15 March 2023

• 01:3801:38, 15 March 2023 diff hist +330‎ Gaussian function ‎ →‎Properties: request clarification

14 March 2023

• 23:5623:56, 14 March 2023 diff hist +595‎ Binomial distribution ‎ →‎Beta distribution: request clarification

5 March 2023

• 04:0204:02, 5 March 2023 diff hist +133‎ Infinite product ‎ →‎Convergence criteria: request clarification

4 March 2023

• 19:5519:55, 4 March 2023 diff hist +29‎ Binomial distribution ‎ →‎Tail bounds: add link to Stirling's approximation wikipedia article

23 February 2023

• 16:1416:14, 23 February 2023 diff hist +404‎ Talk:Negative binomial distribution ‎ →‎Isn't the CDF wrong?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 16:1216:12, 23 February 2023 diff hist +489‎ Talk:Negative binomial distribution ‎ →‎a question: Reply Tag: Reply
• 16:0716:07, 23 February 2023 diff hist −326‎ Negative binomial distribution ‎ fixed the formula for the CDF, provided two references for it, and explained which parameterization was being used
• 15:5415:54, 23 February 2023 diff hist +122‎ Negative binomial distribution ‎ →‎Cumulative distribution function: there seems to be problem with distribution function cited in article
• 15:4515:45, 23 February 2023 diff hist +254‎ Negative binomial distribution ‎ request citation for CDF of negative binomial

11 February 2023

• 17:3217:32, 11 February 2023 diff hist +1,307‎ Axiom of regularity ‎ →‎No infinite descending sequence of sets exists: Request clarification on two subtle points in this section that might not be obvious / lead to mistaken conclusions for those reading this with insufficient background knowledge.

4 February 2023

• 03:0503:05, 4 February 2023 diff hist +295‎ Q-Pochhammer symbol ‎ →‎Relationship to other q-functions: request clarification

29 January 2023

• 00:0800:08, 29 January 2023 diff hist +664‎ Arithmetical hierarchy ‎ →‎The arithmetical hierarchy of formulas: request for a citation of a crucial fact claimed in this section

28 January 2023

• 16:2516:25, 28 January 2023 diff hist +555‎ Talk:Free logic ‎ →‎Logical consequence or material conditional?: new section Tag: New topic
• 16:2016:20, 28 January 2023 diff hist +595‎ Free logic ‎ →‎Explanation: clarification request
• 14:3614:36, 28 January 2023 diff hist +322‎ Robinson arithmetic ‎ clarification request
• 02:2702:27, 28 January 2023 diff hist +795‎ Epsilon-induction ‎ →‎Relation to regularity: clarification requestt

27 January 2023

• 00:3900:39, 27 January 2023 diff hist +73‎ Semantic theory of truth ‎ →‎Tarski's theory of truth: add link to wikipedia article discussing the semantics of first-order logic that Tarski defined
• 00:3800:38, 27 January 2023 diff hist +332‎ Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ added relevant links to Wikipedia articles discussing Tarski's semantics for FOL, and defining what a "first-order theory" is
• 00:2600:26, 27 January 2023 diff hist +393‎ Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Definable relations: fixed the link to the article on the Beth definability theorem
• 00:1900:19, 27 January 2023 diff hist +268‎ Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Embeddings: another instance of relation symbol of object theory being conflated with
• 00:0700:07, 27 January 2023 diff hist +377‎ Talk:Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Homomorphisms: shouldn't the distinction between the symbol R and its interpretations be relevant here?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 00:0600:06, 27 January 2023 diff hist +541‎ Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Homomorphisms: address the issue about conflating relation symbols with their interpretations that was mentioned in the talk page

26 January 2023

• 23:5423:54, 26 January 2023 diff hist +170‎ Talk:Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Homomorphisms: shouldn't the distinction between the symbol R and its interpretations be relevant here?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 23:5323:53, 26 January 2023 diff hist +378‎ Talk:Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Why Sets: Reply Tag: Reply
• 23:5123:51, 26 January 2023 diff hist +2,477‎ Talk:Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Strong homomorphism definition: new section Tag: New topic
• 23:3923:39, 26 January 2023 diff hist +176‎ Structure (mathematical logic) ‎ →‎Homomorphisms: flagging problem with definition of strong homomorphism again

9 January 2023

• 02:5702:57, 9 January 2023 diff hist +431‎ Definable set ‎ →‎The field of real numbers: request clarification of underlying theory being interpreted current
• 02:5302:53, 9 January 2023 diff hist +522‎ Definable set ‎ →‎The natural numbers with only the order relation: request clarification due to implicit but not explicit specification of syntax and semantics
• 01:4901:49, 9 January 2023 diff hist +728‎ First-order logic ‎ →‎Expressiveness: section is giving a confused / misleading description of higher-order logics, so requesting clarification

5 January 2023

• 20:1120:11, 5 January 2023 diff hist +752‎ Axiom of regularity ‎ →‎Regularity and Russell's paradox: historical context is overly informal/without clarification. fine to leave clarification to an external reference, but at least cite something
• 15:4815:48, 5 January 2023 diff hist +656‎ Monadic predicate calculus ‎ Request for terminological clarification and/or standardization throughout the article
• 15:4415:44, 5 January 2023 diff hist +461‎ Monadic predicate calculus ‎ →‎Variants: request for clarification of concepts+terminology and/or a citation and/or explanation of subtle point mentioned here
• 15:3915:39, 5 January 2023 diff hist +628‎ Monadic predicate calculus ‎ →‎Relationship with term logic: request for clarification / standardization of terminology used
• 15:3315:33, 5 January 2023 diff hist +209‎ Monadic predicate calculus ‎ →‎Variants: clarification of terminology / request for standardization of terminology

13 December 2022

• 18:0118:01, 13 December 2022 diff hist +313‎ Network address ‎ request for clarifying figure caption

8 December 2022

• 03:3403:34, 8 December 2022 diff hist +471‎ Wave function collapse ‎ →‎The process of collapse: request for clarification
• 03:2303:23, 8 December 2022 diff hist +178‎ Born rule ‎ →‎Details: request for clarification

3 December 2022

• 01:2801:28, 3 December 2022 diff hist +269‎ Sphaerodactylus ariasae ‎ →‎Description: odd reference in this article, just pointing it out

26 November 2022

• 20:5820:58, 26 November 2022 diff hist +633‎ Multiply transitive group action ‎ Copied definition of multiply transitive from Mathieu group article

25 November 2022

• 17:5317:53, 25 November 2022 diff hist +384‎ Turanoceratops ‎ →‎Paleobiology: requests for citations

21 November 2022

• 02:3102:31, 21 November 2022 diff hist +1,050‎ Truth ‎ →‎Kripke's semantics: Added sentence referencing related concepts in mathematical logic, a relevant citation, and more requests for clarification based on my understanding from that reference Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 02:1502:15, 21 November 2022 diff hist +2,262‎ Truth ‎ →‎Kripke's semantics: really unclear on what the purpose of one of these paragraphs is supposed to be, and whether it is implicitly citing someone's opinion or not

20 November 2022

• 20:4220:42, 20 November 2022 diff hist +91‎ Transfer principle ‎ →‎Transfer principle for the hyperreals: i've seen several (all) sources claim that transfer is only valid for bounded formulas for hyperreals, but never give an example of why it would fail allowing unbounded quantifiers
• 17:4217:42, 20 November 2022 diff hist +24‎ Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory ‎ →‎9. Well-ordering theorem: Does definable here refer to the definition in model theory, i.e. "definable set"? that notion does not necessarily correspond with our intuition of what it means to be "definable" either

16 November 2022

• 03:2903:29, 16 November 2022 diff hist +641‎ Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports ‎ →‎((subst:currentuser)) ((subst:^|DO NOT EDIT THIS LINE)): new section
• 03:2703:27, 16 November 2022 diff hist +81‎ Lymph heart ‎ →‎Lymph heart size and pump rate: sorry this is claiming that both male and female ostriches and emus have lymph-inflated penises? definitely some clarification and citation is needed for that kind of cliam, geez
• 03:2403:24, 16 November 2022 diff hist +19‎ Evolution of fish ‎ →‎†Spiny sharks: a bazillion groups (including trilobites and sea scorpions) died in the end permian extinction, so this sentence seems to offer more of an opinion than a statement of fact (and also doesn't make sense cladistically given that chondrichthyans are still alive -- presumably non-chondricthyan acanthodians are meant?)