24 February 2019

• 09:2309:23, 24 February 2019 diff hist +191‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Is the SPLC reliable? It is reliable
• 09:2109:21, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,514‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ cite your sources. there is no consensus. Tag: Undo
• 09:2009:20, 24 February 2019 diff hist +237‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 09:1709:17, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,514‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ the talk page and sources clearly show there is NOT consensus, stop vandalizing. Tag: Undo
• 09:1309:13, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,606‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ ridiculous... US courts are among the most authoritative and reliable sources; furthermore, i listed newsweek as a source on it which is listed here in this very page as a reliable source. you can't have newsweek be reliable and SPLC be reliable when newsweek is saying SPLC is not reliable. Tag: Undo
• 08:5908:59, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,606‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ I literally labeled this no-consensus. You cannot say there is consensus when a US court has rejected your assertion. Tag: Undo
• 08:5808:58, 24 February 2019 diff hist +189‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 08:5608:56, 24 February 2019 diff hist +111‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 08:5508:55, 24 February 2019 diff hist +23‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ‎ SPLC is has been ruled in court to be unreliable
• 08:5408:54, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,802‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ‎ SPLC is has been ruled in court to be unreliable
• 08:2608:26, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,606‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ SPLC defamation lawsuit updates with sources like newsweek and law.com regarded as "reliable" on this very list, and even SPLC themselves
• 08:1608:16, 24 February 2019 diff hist +459‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC

22 February 2019

• 13:3413:34, 22 February 2019 diff hist +660‎ User talk:4.34.50.170 ‎ →‎February 2019
• 03:4403:44, 22 February 2019 diff hist −231‎ User talk:4.34.50.170 ‎ →‎Rebuttal
• 03:4403:44, 22 February 2019 diff hist +242‎ User talk:4.34.50.170 ‎ →‎February 2019
• 03:4303:43, 22 February 2019 diff hist +231‎ User talk:4.34.50.170 ‎ →‎February 2019
• 03:3503:35, 22 February 2019 diff hist +901‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884512818 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism Tag: Undo
• 03:3403:34, 22 February 2019 diff hist +140‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:4.34.50.170 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: )
• 03:3103:31, 22 February 2019 diff hist +306‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:4.34.50.170 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: )
• 03:2803:28, 22 February 2019 diff hist +901‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884512490 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism Tag: Undo
• 03:2503:25, 22 February 2019 diff hist +901‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884512103 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism. There's literally a US court case showing the position that SPLC is reliable is false. This MUST be at least NC. Tag: Undo
• 03:2203:22, 22 February 2019 diff hist +901‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884510470 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism Tag: Undo
• 03:2103:21, 22 February 2019 diff hist +431‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 03:0603:06, 22 February 2019 diff hist +901‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884509995 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism Tag: Undo
• 03:0503:05, 22 February 2019 diff hist +527‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 03:0203:02, 22 February 2019 diff hist +2‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ fixed language re SPLC
• 03:0103:01, 22 February 2019 diff hist +344‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 02:5902:59, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884509472 by DemocraticLuntz (talk) stop vandalising a united states court ruling Tag: Undo
• 02:5802:58, 22 February 2019 diff hist +9‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:4.34.50.170 reported by User:MrX (Result: )
• 02:5702:57, 22 February 2019 diff hist +303‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:4.34.50.170 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: )
• 02:5202:52, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884508772 by DemocraticLuntz (talk) vandalism, see talk page Tag: Undo
• 02:5002:50, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884508304 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) vandalism, see talk page. I labeled this NC, you are saying there is consensus when a US court has objectively rejected your position. Tag: Undo
• 02:4802:48, 22 February 2019 diff hist +169‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 02:4602:46, 22 February 2019 diff hist +220‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:4.34.50.170 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: )
• 02:4102:41, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884507754 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) see talk page. NONE of you have countered the UNITED STATES COURT CASE REJECTING SPLC's reliability. Tag: Undo
• 02:4002:40, 22 February 2019 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ fixed NC tag
• 02:3902:39, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884506881 by Grayfell (talk) YOU ARE JUST VANDALIZING AT THIS POINT. THERE'S LITERALLY A UNITED STATES COURT WHICH HAS HEARD THE EVIDENCE ON YOUR POSITION AND REJECTED IT WHOLESALE. STOP VANDALIZING. Tag: Undo
• 02:3302:33, 22 February 2019 diff hist +745‎ User talk:Grayfell ‎ SPLC (southern poverty law center)
• 02:3002:30, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884502537 by Grayfell (talk) STOP VANDALISING. THERE'S LITERALLY A COURT OPINION REJECTING YOUR POSITION. SEE TALK PAGE OR YOU WILL BE REFERRED TO WP ADMINS FOR A BAN Tag: Undo
• 02:2902:29, 22 February 2019 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 02:2802:28, 22 February 2019 diff hist −1‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ →‎SPLC
• 02:2802:28, 22 February 2019 diff hist +926‎ Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ SPLC (southern poverty law center)
• 01:5301:53, 22 February 2019 diff hist +899‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ Undid revision 884450424 by MrX (talk) the fact that we're discussing this seriously is proof there is NOT consensus. there is no reason to not label it NC. Tag: Undo

21 February 2019

• 18:1418:14, 21 February 2019 diff hist +821‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ SPLC vandalism, stop removing the court case showing they're not reliable
• 18:0918:09, 21 February 2019 diff hist +637‎ User talk:Grayfell ‎ SPLC on perennial sources list

20 February 2019

• 23:5823:58, 20 February 2019 diff hist +828‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources ‎ SPLC is has been ruled in court to be unreliable
• 23:5023:50, 20 February 2019 diff hist +525‎ Talk:Center for Immigration Studies ‎ SPLC is objectively not reliable